issues
3 rows where "closed_at" is on date 2018-05-22
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, closed_at, author_association, type, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
324451322 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjQ0NTEzMjI= | 273 | Figure out a way to have /-/version return current git commit hash | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2018-05-18T15:16:56Z | 2018-05-22T19:35:22Z | 2018-05-22T19:35:22Z | OWNER | https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/-/versions reports Datasette version `0.21` This isn't actually correct. The deploy script for that site actually deploys current master using `https://github.com/simonw/datasette/archive/master.zip`: https://github.com/simonw/fivethirtyeight-datasette/blob/66b4b0dfedd7237bc8c02d3e26d905bca7b84069/Dockerfile#L9 Ideally this would show the current commit hash, but I'm not at all sure if it's possible to derive that from `pip install https://github.com/simonw/datasette/archive/master.zip`. Is there another mechanism that could be used to reliably `pip install` current master but still provide access to the most recent commit hash? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/273/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | ||||||
324836533 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTg5MzE4NDUz | 277 | Refactor inspect logic | russss 45057 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2018-05-21T08:49:31Z | 2018-05-22T16:07:24Z | 2018-05-22T14:03:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/277 | This pulls the logic for inspect out into a new file which makes it a bit easier to understand. This was going to be the first part of an implementation for #276, but it seems like that might take a while so I'm going to PR a few bits of refactoring individually. | datasette 107914493 | pull | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/277/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 0 | |||||
325352370 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTg5NzA3Mzc0 | 279 | Add version number support with Versioneer | rgieseke 198537 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2018-05-22T15:39:45Z | 2018-05-22T19:35:23Z | 2018-05-22T19:35:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/279 | I think that's all for getting Versioneer support, I've been happily using it in a couple of projects ... ``` In [2]: datasette.__version__ Out[2]: '0.22+3.g6e12445' ``` Repo: https://github.com/warner/python-versioneer Versioneer Licence: Public Domain (CC0-1.0) Closes #273 | datasette 107914493 | pull | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/279/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 0 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);