issues
3 rows where comments = 0 and user = 193185
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1565179870 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5dSr_e | 2013 | Datasette uses non-standard quoting for identifiers | cldellow 193185 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-02-01T00:05:39Z | 2023-02-01T00:06:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Related to #2001, but where #2001 was about literals, this is about identifiers From https://www.sqlite.org/lang_keywords.html: > "keyword" A keyword in double-quotes is an identifier. > [keyword] A keyword enclosed in square brackets is an identifier. This is not standard SQL. This quoting mechanism is used by MS Access and SQL Server and is included in SQLite for compatibility. Datasette uses this quoting here -- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0b4a28691468b5c758df74fa1d72a823813c96bf/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L345-L349, in some of the other DB access code, and in some of the test fixtures. Migrating to standard double quote identifiers would make it easier to get Datasette working with alternative backends | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2013/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | ||||||||
1571711808 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5drmtA | 2018 | `check_visibility` gives confusing (wrong?) results if permission is `None` | cldellow 193185 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-02-06T01:03:08Z | 2023-02-06T01:03:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm trying to gate access to an edit UI on the user having `update-row` on the underlying view or table. I expected [datasette.check_visibility](https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/internals.html#await-check-visibility-actor-action-none-resource-none-permissions-none) to be a good way to do this: ```python visible, private = await datasette.check_visibility( request.actor, permissions=[ ("update-row", (database, table)), ], ) if not visible: return None ``` But `visible` is returning true, even when there is no explicit `update-row` permission. (In this case, `request.actor` is `None`.) Based on [the update-row permissions docs](https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/authentication.html#update-row), I expected this to be default deny, and so no explicit permission would result in false. I think the root cause is that `check_visibility` calls `ensure_permissions` and expects it to throw if the permission is not available. But `ensure_permissions` does not throw when `permission_allowed` returns None: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1.0a2/datasette/app.py#L825-L829 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2018/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | ||||||||
1605959201 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5fuP4h | 2032 | datasette errors when foreign key integrity is enabled | cldellow 193185 | open | 0 | 0 | 2023-03-02T01:27:51Z | 2023-03-02T01:31:58Z | CONTRIBUTOR | By default, [SQLite does not enforce foreign key constraints](https://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html#fk_enable). I typically enable these checks by running: ```sql PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON; ``` inside of a `prepare_connection` hook. If a plugin causes the schema to change (eg datasette-scraper creating a new table, or datasette-edit-schema changing a column), then https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0b4a28691468b5c758df74fa1d72a823813c96bf/datasette/utils/internal_db.py#L71-L77 will fail with: ``` FOREIGN KEY constraint failed ``` This could be resolved by either: - deleting from the `tables` column last - changing the schema so that the foreign keys have [ON DELETE CASCADE](https://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html#fk_actions) Let me know if you'd be open to a PR that addresses this -- since foreign key constraints aren't enabled by default, I guess it's questionable whether this is a bug. I think I can workaround this by inspecting the database parameter in `prepare_connection` and trying not to enable fkey checks on the `_internal` database. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2032/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);