issues
8 rows where comments = 1 and milestone = 8755003
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1197926598 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZujG | 1705 | How to upgrade your plugin for 1.0 documentation | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-04-08T23:16:47Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:05Z | OWNER | Among other things, needed by: - #1704 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1705/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1200649502 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHUe | 1709 | Redesigned JSON API with ?_extra= parameters | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-04-11T22:57:49Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:06Z | OWNER | This will be the single biggest breaking change for the 1.0 release. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1709/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1200650491 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHj7 | 1711 | Template context powered entirely by the JSON API format | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-04-11T22:59:27Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:06Z | OWNER | Datasette 1.0 will have a stable template context. I'm going to achieve this by refactoring the templates to work only with keys returned by the API (or some of its extras) - then the API documentation will double up as template documentation. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1711/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1426080014 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAEEO | 1867 | /db/table/-/rename API (also allows atomic replace) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-10-27T18:13:23Z | 2023-01-09T15:34:12Z | OWNER | > There's one catch with batched inserts: if your CLI tool fails half way through you could end up with a partially populated table - since a bunch of batches will have succeeded first. > > ... > > If people care about that kind of thing they could always push all of their inserts to a table called `_tablename` and then atomically rename that once they've uploaded all of the data (assuming I provide an atomic-rename-this-table mechanism). _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1866#issuecomment-1293893789_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1867/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1468689139 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ximrz | 1914 | Finalize design of JSON for Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-11-29T20:59:10Z | 2022-12-13T06:15:54Z | OWNER | Tracking issue. - [ ] #1709 - [ ] #1729 - [ ] #1875 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1914/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1490576818 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Y2GWy | 1943 | `/-/permissions` should list available permissions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-12-11T23:38:03Z | 2022-12-15T00:41:37Z | OWNER | > Idea: a `/-/permissions` introspection endpoint for listing registered permissions _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1939#issuecomment-1345691103_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1943/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1495716243 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZJtGT | 1952 | Improvements to /-/create-token restrictions interface | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-12-14T05:22:39Z | 2022-12-14T05:23:13Z | OWNER | > It would be neat not to show write permissions against immutable databases too - and not hard from a performance perspective since it doesn't involve hundreds more permission checks. > > That will need permissions to grow a flag for if they need a mutable database though, which is a bigger job. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1947#issuecomment-1350414402_ Also, DO show the `_memory` database there if Datasette was started in `--crossdb` mode. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1952/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1649791661 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5iVdKt | 2050 | Row page JSON should use new ?_extra= format | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2023-03-31T17:56:53Z | 2023-03-31T17:59:49Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable/2.json Related: - #2049 - #1709 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2050/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);