issues
2 rows where comments = 1 and user = 51016
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
988555009 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NzI3NDM2NDA0 | 1458 | Rework the `--static` documentation a bit | ctb 51016 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2021-09-05T17:08:48Z | 2021-10-15T13:24:29Z | 2021-10-14T18:39:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/1458 | Per https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1457, I was confused by the current docs and took a few minutes to sort out what the right combination of locations was. This is a PR that differentiates the docs to split out `/static/` in URL from `--static` option and `./static/` path. Not wedded to the details in any way, happy to change to suit. Fixes #1457. | datasette 107914493 | pull | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1458/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 0 | |||||
988556488 | MDU6SXNzdWU5ODg1NTY0ODg= | 1459 | suggestion: allow `datasette --open` to take a relative URL | ctb 51016 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-09-05T17:17:07Z | 2021-09-05T19:59:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR | (soft suggestion because I'm not sure I'm using datasette right yet) Over at https://github.com/ctb/2021-sourmash-datasette, I'm playing around with datasette, and I'm creating some static pages to send people to the right facets. There may well be better ways of achieving this end goal, and I will find out if so, I'm sure! But regardless I think it might be neat to support an option to allow `-o/--open` to take a relative URL, that then gets appended to the hostname and port. This would let me improve my documentation. I don't see any downsides, either, but 🤷 there may well be some :) Happy to dig in and provide a PR if it's of interest. I'm not sure off the top of my head how to support an optional value to a parameter in argparse - the current `-o` behavior is kinda nice so it'd be suboptimal to require a url for `-o`. Maybe `--open-url=` or something would work? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1459/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);