issues
15 rows where comments = 1 and milestone = 3268330 sorted by pull_request
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, state, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request ▼ | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
444746021 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDQ3NDYwMjE= | 468 | Pagination for the database index page | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2019-05-16T04:13:56Z | 2020-10-16T23:20:26Z | 2020-10-16T23:20:22Z | OWNER | Some databases have a LOT of tables. Now that we often calculate table row counts dynamically we could really speed things up by paginating the database index page, e.g. http://fivethirtyeight-datasette.herokuapp.com/fivethirtyeight If we're paginating, having a filter-search-for-table widget (similar to the search-for-database widget I'm planning for the homepage) would make sense. Related: pagination for homepage #461 and Datasette Library #417 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/468/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
642297505 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDIyOTc1MDU= | 857 | Comprehensive documentation for variables made available to templates | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2020-06-20T03:19:43Z | 2022-10-26T02:58:17Z | 2022-10-26T02:58:17Z | OWNER | Needed for the Datasette 1.0 release, so template authors can trust that Datasette is unlikely to break their templates. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/857/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
687694947 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODc2OTQ5NDc= | 954 | Remove old register_output_renderer dict mechanism in Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2020-08-28T04:04:23Z | 2020-08-28T04:56:31Z | OWNER | > Documentation says that the old dictionary mechanism will be deprecated by 1.0: > > https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/799ecae94824640bdff21f86997f69844048d5c3/docs/plugin_hooks.rst#L460 _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/953#issuecomment-682312494_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/954/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
780153562 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODAxNTM1NjI= | 1177 | Ability to stream all rows as newline-delimited JSON | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2021-01-06T07:10:48Z | 2022-03-21T15:08:52Z | OWNER | > Yet another use-case for this: I want to be able to stream newline-delimited JSON in order to better import into Pandas: > > pandas.read_json("https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys.json?_shape=array&_nl=on", lines=True) _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1101#issuecomment-755128038_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1177/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
812704869 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTI3MDQ4Njk= | 1237 | ?_pretty=1 option for pretty-printing JSON output | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2021-02-20T20:54:40Z | 2021-11-16T18:28:33Z | OWNER | Suggested by @frankieroberto in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-782746755 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1237/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1054246919 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1ogH | 1511 | Review plugin hooks for Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2021-11-15T23:26:05Z | 2021-11-16T01:20:14Z | OWNER | I need to perform a detailed review of the plugin interface - especially the plugin hooks like [register_facet_classes()](https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/plugin_hooks.html#register-facet-classes) which I don't yet have complete confidence in. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1511/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1169840669 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Fulod | 1658 | Revert main to version that passes tests | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-15T15:37:02Z | 2022-03-19T04:04:50Z | 2022-03-15T15:42:58Z | OWNER | > I've made a real mess of this. I'm going to revert Datasette`main` back to the last commit that passed the tests and try this again in a branch. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1657#issuecomment-1068125636_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1658/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1174697144 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GBHS4 | 1672 | Refactor CSV handling code out of DataView | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-20T21:47:00Z | 2022-03-20T21:52:39Z | OWNER | > I think the way to get rid of most of the remaining complexity in `DataView` is to refactor how CSV stuff works - pulling it in line with other export factors and extracting the streaming mechanism. Opening a fresh issue for that. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1660#issuecomment-1073355032_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1672/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1174717287 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GBMNn | 1674 | Tweak design of /.json | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-20T22:58:01Z | 2022-03-20T22:58:40Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/.json Currently: ```json { "_memory": { "name": "_memory", "hash": null, "color": "a6c7b9", "path": "/_memory", "tables_and_views_truncated": [], "tables_and_views_more": false, "tables_count": 0, "table_rows_sum": 0, "show_table_row_counts": false, "hidden_table_rows_sum": 0, "hidden_tables_count": 0, "views_count": 0, "private": false }, "fixtures": { "name": "fixtures", "hash": "645005884646eb941c89997fbd1c0dd6be517cb1b493df9816ae497c0c5afbaa", "color": "645005", "path": "/fixtures", "tables_and_views_truncated": [ { "name": "compound_three_primary_keys", "columns": [ "pk1", "pk2", "pk3", "content" ], "primary_keys": [ "pk1", "pk2", "pk3" ], "count": 1001, "hidden": false, "fts_table": null, "num_relationships_for_sorting": 0, "private": false }, ``` As-of this issue the `"path"` key is confusing, it doesn't match what https://latest.datasette.io/-/databases returns: - #1668 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1674/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1175694248 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE6uo | 1677 | Remove `check_permission()` from `BaseView` | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-21T17:18:18Z | 2022-03-21T18:45:04Z | 2022-03-21T18:45:03Z | OWNER | Follow-on from: - #1675 Refs: - #1660 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1677/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1175715988 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFACU | 1678 | Make `check_visibility()` a documented API | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-21T17:30:34Z | 2022-03-21T19:04:03Z | 2022-03-21T19:01:46Z | OWNER | Spotted this while working on: - #1677 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L1005-L1021 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1678/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1189113609 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5G4G8J | 1697 | `Request.fake(..., url_vars={})` | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-04-01T01:48:40Z | 2022-04-01T02:02:18Z | 2022-04-01T02:02:10Z | OWNER | I just created an alternative `.fake()` method because I wanted to fake the `url_vars` captured in the route as well: ```python from datasette.utils.asgi import Request class Request(Request): @classmethod def fake(cls, path_with_query_string, method="GET", scheme="http", url_vars=None): """Useful for constructing Request objects for tests""" path, _, query_string = path_with_query_string.partition("?") scope = { "http_version": "1.1", "method": method, "path": path, "raw_path": path_with_query_string.encode("latin-1"), "query_string": query_string.encode("latin-1"), "scheme": scheme, "type": "http", } if url_vars: scope["url_route"] = { "kwargs": url_vars } return cls(scope, None) ``` | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1697/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1487738738 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5YrRdy | 1942 | Option for plugins to request that JSON be served on the page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-12-10T01:08:53Z | 2022-12-10T01:11:30Z | OWNER | Idea came from a conversation with @hydrosquall - what if a Datasette plugin could say "I'd like the JSON for a page to be included in a variable on the HTML page"? `datasette-cluster-map` already needs this - the first thing it does when the page loads is `fetch()` a JSON representation of that same data. This idea fits with my overall goals to unify the JSON and HTML context too. Refs: - #1711 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1942/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1563264257 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5dLYUB | 2010 | Row page should default to card view | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2023-01-30T21:49:37Z | 2023-01-30T21:52:06Z | OWNER | Datasette currently uses the same table layout on the row pages as it does on the table pages: https://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages?_sort=name&name__exact=datasette-column-inspect <img width="1068" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/215602793-b15dad48-c3e9-4f34-9875-3e79b7aa586d.png"> https://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages/datasette-column-inspect <img width="1068" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/215602883-9d714eec-3908-493e-93d0-c788af47ba21.png"> If you shrink down to mobile width you get this instead, on both of those pages: <img width="613" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/215602964-b95aa089-0269-4647-beae-66fffad332f5.png"> I think that view, which I think of as the "card view", is plain better if you're looking at just a single row - and it (or a variant of it) should be the default presentation on the row page. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2010/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1571207083 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5dprer | 2016 | Database metadata fields like description are not available in the index page template's context | palewire 9993 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2023-02-05T02:25:53Z | 2023-02-05T22:56:43Z | NONE | When looping through `databases` in the index.html template, I'd like to print the description of each database alongside its name. But it appears that isn't passed in from the view, unless I'm missing it. It would be great to have that. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2016/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);
comments 1 ✖