issues
10 rows where comments = 4 and milestone = 3268330
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, state, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
443021509 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDMwMjE1MDk= | 461 | Paginate + search for databases/tables on the homepage | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-05-11T18:05:34Z | 2020-12-17T22:14:46Z | OWNER | Split out from #460 - in order to support large numbers of connected databases the homepage needs to be paginated. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/461/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
449854604 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk4NTQ2MDQ= | 492 | Facets not correctly persisted in hidden form fields | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-05-29T14:49:39Z | 2020-09-15T20:12:29Z | 2020-09-15T20:12:29Z | OWNER | Steps to reproduce: visit https://2a4b892.datasette.io/fixtures/roadside_attractions?_facet_m2m=attraction_characteristic and click "Apply" Result is a 500: `no such column: attraction_characteristic` The error occurs because of this hidden HTML input: <input type="hidden" name="_facet" value="attraction_characteristic"> This should be: <input type="hidden" name="_facet_m2m" value="attraction_characteristic"> | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/492/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
456568880 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTY1Njg4ODA= | 509 | Support opening multiple databases with the same stem | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-06-15T19:32:00Z | 2020-12-22T20:04:35Z | 2020-12-22T20:04:35Z | OWNER | e.g. I should be able to do this: datasette App/data.db Other_App/data.db This currently errors because you can't have two databases taking the `/data` URL path. Instead, how about in this particular case assigning the second database `/data-1`? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/509/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | ||||
459590021 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTk1OTAwMjE= | 519 | Decide what goes into Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-06-23T15:47:41Z | 2021-11-15T23:26:11Z | 2021-11-15T23:26:11Z | OWNER | Datasette ASGI #272 is a big part of it... but 1.0 will generally be an indicator that Datasette is a stable platform for developers to write plugins and custom templates against. So lots to think about. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/519/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
570301333 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzAzMDEzMzM= | 684 | Add documentation on Database introspection methods to internals.rst | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2020-02-25T04:20:24Z | 2020-06-04T18:56:15Z | 2020-05-30T18:40:39Z | OWNER | `internals.rst` will be landing as part of #683 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/684/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1065429936 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gSuw | 1532 | Use datasette-table Web Component to guide the design of the JSON API for 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2021-11-28T20:37:18Z | 2022-03-16T20:13:34Z | OWNER | I realized that one of the reasons I'm having trouble committing to nailing down the JSON API for 1.0 is that I don't use it much myself - I use the `?_shape=array` one quite often, but I don't have any projects that are using the default, more fully-featured API. As an experiment I built a Web Component for embedding Datasette tables on pages - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-table - and I think it's actually going to be a really useful tool for helping me dog food the v1.0 API design. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1532/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1065431383 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gTFX | 1533 | Add `Link: rel="alternate"` header pointing to JSON for a table/query | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2021-11-28T20:43:25Z | 2022-02-02T07:56:51Z | 2022-02-02T07:49:33Z | OWNER | Originally explored in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-notebook/issues/2#issuecomment-980789406 - I wanted an efficient way to scan a list of URLs and figure out which if any of those corresponded to Datasette tables, canned queries or SQL output that could be represented as a table on a page. It looks like a neat way to do that is with ` Link:` header like this: `Link: http://127.0.0.1:8058/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys.json; rel="alternate"; type="application/datasette+json"` I can put a `<link href=...` in the page header too. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1533/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1131295060 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5DbjFU | 1634 | Update Dockerfile generated by `datasette publish` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2022-02-11T00:07:26Z | 2022-03-11T17:38:08Z | OWNER | The generated `Dockerfile` currently looks something like this: ```Dockerfile FROM python:3.8 COPY . /app WORKDIR /app ENV DATASETTE_SECRET 'edab49cbc5d5f6f33238f54852037e3fee710821960b73edd2ce743454182ae2' RUN pip install -U datasette datasette-auth-passwords datasette-tiddlywiki datasette-graphql RUN datasette inspect fixtures.db other.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json ENV PORT 8080 EXPOSE 8080 CMD datasette serve --host 0.0.0.0 -i fixtures.db -i other.db --cors --inspect-file inspect-data.json --metadata metadata.json --create --port $PORT /data/*.db ``` This is still on Python 3.8, and it generates a pretty large image compared to the `Dockerfile` used for https://hub.docker.com/datasetteproject/datasette - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.60.2/Dockerfile Here's the code that generates it: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7d24fd405f3c60e4c852c5d746c91aa2ba23cf5b/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L389-L400 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1634/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 2, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1154399841 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ezr5h | 1645 | Sensible `cache-control` headers for static assets, including those served by plugins | curiousleo 697092 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2022-02-28T18:12:03Z | 2022-03-08T02:59:29Z | NONE | ## What I'm seeing With `default_cache_ttl = 86400`, I see the following: A table view returns `Cache-control: max-age=86400`: ![Screenshot_20220228_190000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/697092/156034352-4d64683e-39c8-49af-81df-0217a5957bbd.png) A static asset returns no `Cache-control` header: ![Screenshot_20220228_185933](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/697092/156034363-d0b03cc2-5889-4ed2-b601-8c1846b8469a.png) ## What I expected to see I expected the static asset to return a `Cache-control` header indicating that this response can be cached. ## Why this matters I'm productionising a Datasette deployment right now and was looking into putting it behind a Varnish instance. I was surprised to see requests for static assets being served from Datasette rather than Varnish, this is what led me to look more closely at the response headers. While Datasette serves those static assets pretty quickly, I don't see why Datasette should serve them. By their nature, static assets like images and JS files are very cacheable, so it should be easy to serve them from a cache like Varnish. (Note that Varnish can easily be configured to override this header, enabling caching for static assets. But it would be better if this override was not necessary.) ## Discussion It seems clear to me that serving static assets without a `Cache-control` header is not ideal. I see two options here: A. Static assets use the same logic as table / SQL views to set the `Cache-control` header based on `default_cache_ttl`. B. An additional setting for static assets is introduced (`default_static_cache_ttl`, say). | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1645/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1529707837 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5bLX09 | 1988 | Reconsider pattern where plugins could break existing template context | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2023-01-11T21:13:43Z | 2023-01-11T21:25:05Z | OWNER | > I hadn't run into an issue with plugins like `datasette-template-sql` interfering with the existing context for other features before! Definitely not a good thing. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-write/issues/6#issuecomment-1379490596_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1988/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);
comments 1 ✖