issues
103 rows where milestone = 3268330 and user = 9599
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1456013930 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WyQJq | 1906 | Extract publish Heroku support to a plugin | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-11-19T00:02:51Z | 2022-11-19T00:03:10Z | OWNER | > This is a strong argument for extracting the Heroku support out to a plugin - it would allow this to be fixed with a plugin release without needing to push a full release of Datasette itself. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1905#issuecomment-1320678715_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1906/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1479920517 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5YNcuF | 1934 | Return number of ignored/replaced items from /-/insert | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-12-06T19:01:58Z | 2022-12-06T19:02:03Z | OWNER | Idea from here: - https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/516 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1934/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1483250004 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5YaJlU | 1936 | Fix /db/table/-/upsert in the API explorer | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2022-12-08T00:59:34Z | 2022-12-08T01:36:02Z | OWNER | Split from: - #1931 - #1878 This is a bit tricky because the code needs to figure out what the primary keys are for an item, and whether or not `rowid` should be included. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1936/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1487738738 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5YrRdy | 1942 | Option for plugins to request that JSON be served on the page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-12-10T01:08:53Z | 2022-12-10T01:11:30Z | OWNER | Idea came from a conversation with @hydrosquall - what if a Datasette plugin could say "I'd like the JSON for a page to be included in a variable on the HTML page"? `datasette-cluster-map` already needs this - the first thing it does when the page loads is `fetch()` a JSON representation of that same data. This idea fits with my overall goals to unify the JSON and HTML context too. Refs: - #1711 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1942/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1529707837 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5bLX09 | 1988 | Reconsider pattern where plugins could break existing template context | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2023-01-11T21:13:43Z | 2023-01-11T21:25:05Z | OWNER | > I hadn't run into an issue with plugins like `datasette-template-sql` interfering with the existing context for other features before! Definitely not a good thing. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-write/issues/6#issuecomment-1379490596_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1988/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1558644003 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5c5wUj | 2006 | Teach `datasette publish` to pin to `datasette<1.0` in a 0.x release | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2023-01-26T19:17:40Z | 2023-01-26T19:20:53Z | OWNER | I just realized that when I ship Datasette 1.0 there may be automated deployments out there which could deploy the 1.0 version by accident, potentially breaking any customizations that aren't compatible with the 1.0 changes. I can hopefully help avoid that by shipping one last entry in the `0.x` series that ensures `datasette publish` pins to `<1.0` when it installs Datasette itself. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2006/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1563264257 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5dLYUB | 2010 | Row page should default to card view | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2023-01-30T21:49:37Z | 2023-01-30T21:52:06Z | OWNER | Datasette currently uses the same table layout on the row pages as it does on the table pages: https://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages?_sort=name&name__exact=datasette-column-inspect <img width="1068" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/215602793-b15dad48-c3e9-4f34-9875-3e79b7aa586d.png"> https://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages/datasette-column-inspect <img width="1068" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/215602883-9d714eec-3908-493e-93d0-c788af47ba21.png"> If you shrink down to mobile width you get this instead, on both of those pages: <img width="613" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/215602964-b95aa089-0269-4647-beae-66fffad332f5.png"> I think that view, which I think of as the "card view", is plain better if you're looking at just a single row - and it (or a variant of it) should be the default presentation on the row page. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2010/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1615692818 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5gTYQS | 2035 | Potential feature: special support for `?a=1&a=2` on the query page | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 14 | 2023-03-08T18:05:03Z | 2023-03-31T16:09:08Z | OWNER | From a discussion on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/996877076982415491/1082789517062320138 The key idea is to make it easier for people to implement `where id in (...)` that's populated from query string arguments. What if you could add `?id=11&id=32&id=62` to the URL and have that made available as a list that can be used in the query? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2035/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1641013220 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5hz9_k | 2045 | First column on a view page has no facet option in cog menu | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2023-03-26T18:02:47Z | 2023-03-26T18:02:48Z | OWNER | e.g. first column on this page - cog menu has no option to facet. https://datasette.io/content/tools <img width="531" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/227795084-1a36bec3-f274-4381-909d-c691317d803b.png"> | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2045/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);