issues
3 rows where "updated_at" is on date 2018-05-18 and user = 9599
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
323673899 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM2NzM4OTk= | 264 | Make it possible to customize various facet settings | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2018-05-16T15:31:34Z | 2018-05-18T06:18:00Z | 2018-05-18T05:11:52Z | OWNER | The new Facets implementation from #255 includes several hard-coded settings which should be made configurable somehow: Number of rows to return in a facet (maybe this should also be an option that can be set via quersytring argument, e.g. `?_facet=qSpecies:40`): https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/9959a9e4deec8e3e178f919e8b494214d5faa7fd/datasette/views/table.py#L539 Time limit for executing a facet: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/9959a9e4deec8e3e178f919e8b494214d5faa7fd/datasette/views/table.py#L559-L562 Maximum unique values returned in order for a column to be suggested as a facet: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/9959a9e4deec8e3e178f919e8b494214d5faa7fd/datasette/views/table.py#L646-L647 Time limit for calculating if a column should be a suggested facet: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/9959a9e4deec8e3e178f919e8b494214d5faa7fd/datasette/views/table.py#L664-L667 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/264/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | ||||||
323726888 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM3MjY4ODg= | 269 | If a facet fails due to timing out, let the user know somehow | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 0 | 2018-05-16T18:01:47Z | 2018-05-18T06:11:46Z | 2018-05-18T06:11:46Z | OWNER | Refs #255 - right now facets fail silently if the user requested them but they take longer than 200ms to calculate - see also #264 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/269/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | ||||||
323830051 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM4MzAwNTE= | 270 | --limit= CLI option for setting limits | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 1 | 2018-05-17T00:14:24Z | 2018-05-18T06:19:31Z | 2018-05-18T06:16:39Z | OWNER | #264 calls for four new datasette limit options, on top of the two existing ones: * `--max_returned_rows` * `--sql_time_limit_ms` These are already clogging up `datasette serve --help` a bit. How about this syntax instead? datasette --limit max_returned_rows:100 \ --limit facet_timeout_ms:500 demo.db Then we can add as many new user over-rideable limits as we like without clogging up `--help` too much - though it would be good to have a way of optionally listings their documentation as well. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/270/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);