issues
2 rows where "updated_at" is on date 2021-03-12 and user = 9599
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
787173276 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODcxNzMyNzY= | 1193 | Research plugin hook for alternative database backends | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | 1 | 2021-01-15T20:27:50Z | 2021-03-12T01:01:54Z | OWNER | I started exploring what Datasette would like running against PostgreSQL in #670 and @dazzag24 did some work on Parquet described in #657. I had initially thought this was WAY too much additional complexity, but I'm beginning to think that the `Database` class may be small enough that having it abstract away the details of running queries against alternative database backends could be feasible. A bigger issue is SQL generation, but I realized that most of Datasette's SQL generation code exists just in the `TableView` class that runs the table page. If this was abstracted into some kind of SQL builder that could be then customized per-database it might be reasonable to get it working. Very unlikely for this to make it into Datasette 1.0, but maybe this would be the defining feature of Datasette 2.0? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1193/reactions", "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | ||||||||
824067604 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MjQwNjc2MDQ= | 1250 | Research: Plugin hook for alternative database connections | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | 2 | 2021-03-08T00:28:15Z | 2021-03-12T01:01:25Z | 2021-03-12T01:01:17Z | OWNER | The `Database` class is a natural looking fit for a plugin hook to load custom database connections... potentially even databases other than SQLite. DuckDB (refs #968) could make for a great starting point, since it looks very compatible with the existing SQLite code. The real win would be if this could lead to running Datasette against PostgreSQL. I made some initial explorations in that direction a while ago in #670. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1250/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);