issues
1 row where user = 8431341
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
512996469 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MTI5OTY0Njk= | 607 | Ways to improve fuzzy search speed on larger data sets? | zeluspudding 8431341 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2019-10-27T17:31:37Z | 2019-11-07T03:38:10Z | 2019-11-07T03:38:10Z | NONE | I have an sqlite table with 16 million rows in it. Having read @simonw article "[Fast Autocomplete Search for Your Website](https://24ways.org/2018/fast-autocomplete-search-for-your-website/)" I was curious to try datasette to see what kind of query performance I could get out of it. In truth I don't need to do full text search since all I would like to do is give my users a way to search for the names of investors such as "Warren Buffet", or "Tim Cook" (who's names are in a single column). On the first search, Datasette takes over 20 seconds to return all records associated with `elon musk`: > ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8431341/67638889-a86e1100-f8b7-11e9-9f7e-a9d13a42e988.png) > ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8431341/67638825-ed457800-f8b6-11e9-94d1-b44f1a40ee8c.png) If I rerun the same search, it then takes almost 9 seconds: > ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8431341/67638908-e4a17180-f8b7-11e9-9d00-748c80ef1f21.png) That's far to slow to implement an autocomplete feature. I could reduce the latency by making a special table of only unique investor names, thereby reducing the search space to less than a million rows (then I'd need to implement a way to add only new investor names to the table as I received new data.. about 4,000 rows a day). If I did that, I'm still concerned the new table wouldn't be lean enough to lookup investor names quickly. Plus, even if I can implement the autocomplete feature, I would still finally have to lookup records for that investors which would take between 8 - 20 seconds. Are there any tricks for speeding this up? Here's my hardware: > ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8431341/67638861-55945980-f8b7-11e9-96a8-ca76c7c68c5d.png) | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/607/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);