github
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705899629 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705899629 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTg5OTYyOQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T00:37:02Z | 2020-10-09T00:37:02Z | OWNER | I'm going to route the existing `TestClient` through this mechanism to exercise it during the tests. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705902902 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705902902 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkwMjkwMg== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T00:50:49Z | 2020-10-09T00:50:49Z | OWNER | Almost all of the tests are passing: ``` =========================== short test summary info ============================ FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_table_with_slashes_in_name - assert 404 == 200 FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_row_strange_table_name - assert 404 == 200 FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_row_strange_table_name_with_url_hash - assert... FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_css_classes_on_body[/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv-expected_classes5] FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_templates_considered[/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv-table-fixtures-tablewithslashescsv-fa7563.html, *table.html] FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys-https://example.com/] FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys/a,a,a-https://example.com/] FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/paginated_view-https://example.com/] FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/facetable-https://example.com/] FAILED tests/test_messages.py::test_messages_are_displayed_and_cleared - KeyE... FAILED tests/test_plugins.py::test_hook_register_magic_parameters - Assertion... ============ 11 failed, 718 passed, 6 warnings in 225.77s (0:03:45) ============ ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1001#issuecomment-705904566 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1001 | 705904566 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkwNDU2Ng== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T00:58:08Z | 2020-10-09T00:58:08Z | OWNER | To get a traceback: ``` datasette . -p 8009 --pdb ``` And then: ``` curl -XOPTIONS http://127.0.0.1:8009 ``` This causes the server to open a debugging prompt: ``` INFO: 127.0.0.1:59514 - "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1" 500 Internal Server Error > /Users/simon/Dropbox/Development/datasette/datasette/views/base.py(115)dispatch_request() -> return await handler(request, *args, **kwargs) (Pdb) list 110 def database_color(self, database): 111 return "ff0000" 112 113 async def dispatch_request(self, request, *args, **kwargs): 114 handler = getattr(self, request.method.lower(), None) 115 -> return await handler(request, *args, **kwargs) 116 117 async def render(self, templates, request, context=None): 118 context = context or {} 119 template = self.ds.jinja_env.select_template(templates) 120 template_context = { (Pdb) ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717768441 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1001#issuecomment-705904679 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1001 | 705904679 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkwNDY3OQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T00:58:32Z | 2020-10-09T00:58:32Z | OWNER | So the bug is in this code here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/703439bdc37e724b01bc6d7a1fc1d955795132f2/datasette/views/base.py#L113-L115 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717768441 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1001#issuecomment-705904759 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1001 | 705904759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkwNDc1OQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T00:58:47Z | 2020-10-09T00:58:47Z | OWNER | What should an OPTIONS request return, anyway? | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717768441 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1001#issuecomment-705904917 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1001 | 705904917 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkwNDkxNw== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T00:59:25Z | 2020-10-09T00:59:25Z | OWNER | ``` ~ % curl -XOPTIONS https://www.google.com/ <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang=en> <meta charset=utf-8> <meta name=viewport content="initial-scale=1, minimum-scale=1, width=device-width"> <title>Error 405 (Method Not Allowed)!!1</title> ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717768441 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1001#issuecomment-705905121 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1001 | 705905121 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkwNTEyMQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T01:00:07Z | 2020-10-09T01:00:07Z | OWNER | The www.djangoproject.com site returns an empty page: ``` ~ % curl -vv -XOPTIONS https://www.djangoproject.com/ * Trying 151.101.42.217:443... * Connected to www.djangoproject.com (151.101.42.217) port 443 (#0) * ALPN, offering http/1.1 * TLS 1.2 connection using TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 * Server certificate: osff2.map.fastly.net * Server certificate: GlobalSign CloudSSL CA - SHA256 - G3 * Server certificate: GlobalSign Root CA > OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1 > Host: www.djangoproject.com > User-Agent: curl/7.70.0 > Accept: */* > * Mark bundle as not supporting multiuse < HTTP/1.1 200 OK < Connection: keep-alive < Content-Length: 0 < Server: nginx < Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 < Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS < Content-Language: en < X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN < X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff < X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block < Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload < Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://code.djangoproject.com < Accept-Ranges: bytes < Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:59:42 GMT < Via: 1.1 varnish < X-Served-By: cache-sjc10047-SJC < X-Cache: MISS < X-Cache-Hits: 0 < X-Timer: S1602205182.833493,VS0,VE305 < Vary: Accept-Language, Accept-Encoding < * Connection #0 to host www.djangoproject.com left intact ~ % ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717768441 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1001#issuecomment-705905418 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1001 | 705905418 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkwNTQxOA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T01:00:54Z | 2020-10-09T01:00:54Z | OWNER | https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Methods/OPTIONS | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717768441 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1001#issuecomment-705916614 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1001 | 705916614 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkxNjYxNA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T01:37:06Z | 2020-10-09T01:37:06Z | OWNER | I'm tempted to imitate Django Rest Framework here: https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/blob/2e721cdbc85a924d0b0f093b86fe1497b58fe287/rest_framework/views.py#L514-L521 ```python def options(self, request, *args, **kwargs): """ Handler method for HTTP 'OPTIONS' request. """ if self.metadata_class is None: return self.http_method_not_allowed(request, *args, **kwargs) data = self.metadata_class().determine_metadata(request, self) return Response(data, status=status.HTTP_200_OK) ``` That `determine_metadata()` default method does this: https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/blob/335054a5d36b352a58286b303b608b6bf48152f8/rest_framework/metadata.py#L29 Note the comment at the top: ``` There are not any formalized standards for `OPTIONS` responses for us to base this on. ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717768441 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1001#issuecomment-705917015 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1001 | 705917015 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkxNzAxNQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T01:38:49Z | 2020-10-09T01:38:49Z | OWNER | I actually have a sensible `OPTIONS` implementation here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/a648bb82bac201c7658f6fdb499ff8ac17ebd2e8/datasette/views/base.py#L154-L165 I'm going to set the default one to return a 405 (Method Not Allowed) like Google does. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717768441 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705918844 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705918844 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkxODg0NA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T01:46:06Z | 2020-10-09T01:46:06Z | OWNER | For this failing test I'm suspicious that the AsyncClient may be persisting cookies in between requests: ``` def test_actor_cookie(app_client): "A valid actor cookie sets request.scope['actor']" cookie = app_client.actor_cookie({"id": "test"}) response = app_client.get("/", cookies={"ds_actor": cookie}) > assert {"id": "test"} == app_client.ds._last_request.scope["actor"] E AssertionError: assert {'id': 'test'} == {'id': 'root'} E Differing items: E {'id': 'test'} != {'id': 'root'} E Use -v to get the full diff ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705920055 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705920055 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkyMDA1NQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T01:51:05Z | 2020-10-09T01:51:05Z | OWNER | The topic of disabling cookie persistence is discussed a little here: https://github.com/encode/httpx/issues/422#issuecomment-537906693 > We have a cookiejar abstraction, I think setting it to an always-empty jar like you describe is best. :) | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705920228 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705920228 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkyMDIyOA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T01:51:44Z | 2020-10-09T01:51:44Z | OWNER | I'm going to switch back to having each request run through a new client. I'm worried about the impact on test performance though. I'll run a microbenchmark before and after. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705921006 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705921006 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkyMTAwNg== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T01:55:01Z | 2020-10-09T01:55:01Z | OWNER | With the single client that is reused for all tests: ``` % time pytest tests/test_api.py ... 6.73s user 9.91s system 81% cpu 20.365 total ``` After switching back to this class: ```python class DatasetteClient: def __init__(self, ds): self.app = ds.app() def _fix(self, path): if path.startswith("/"): path = "http://localhost{}".format(path) return path async def get(self, path, **kwargs): async with httpx.AsyncClient(app=self.app) as client: return await client.get(self._fix(path), **kwargs) async def options(self, path, **kwargs): async with httpx.AsyncClient(app=self.app) as client: return await client.options(self._fix(path), **kwargs) async def head(self, path, **kwargs): async with httpx.AsyncClient(app=self.app) as client: return await client.head(self._fix(path), **kwargs) async def post(self, path, **kwargs): async with httpx.AsyncClient(app=self.app) as client: return await client.post(self._fix(path), **kwargs) async def put(self, path, **kwargs): async with httpx.AsyncClient(app=self.app) as client: return await client.put(self._fix(path), **kwargs) async def patch(self, path, **kwargs): async with httpx.AsyncClient(app=self.app) as client: return await client.patch(self._fix(path), **kwargs) async def delete(self, path, **kwargs): async with httpx.AsyncClient(app=self.app) as client: return await client.delete(self._fix(path), **kwargs) async def request(self, method, path, **kwargs): async with httpx.AsyncClient(app=self.app) as client: return await client.request(method, self._fix(path), **kwargs) ``` The time taken is: ``` % time pytest tests/test_api.py ... 7.26s user 10.02s system 82% cpu 21.014 total ``` That's close enough that I don't feel I need to investigate this further. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705926035 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705926035 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkyNjAzNQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T02:14:14Z | 2020-10-09T02:14:14Z | OWNER | Still need to handle these six failing tests: ``` FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys-https://example.com/] - AssertionError: {'base_url': 'https://example.com/', 'elemen... FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys/a,a,a-https://example.com/] - AssertionError: {'base_url': 'https://example.com/', '... FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/paginated_view-https://example.com/] - AssertionError: {'base_url': 'https://example.com/', 'element_parent': '<... FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/facetable-https://example.com/] - AssertionError: {'base_url': 'https://example.com/', 'element_parent': '<p cla... FAILED tests/test_messages.py::test_messages_are_displayed_and_cleared - KeyError: 'ds_messages' FAILED tests/test_plugins.py::test_hook_register_magic_parameters - AssertionError: assert [{'line': '1.0', 'rowid': 1}] == [{'line': '1.1', 'rowid': 1}] =========================================================== 6 failed, 731 passed, 6 warnings in 129.17s (0:02:09) =========================================================== ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705926445 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705926445 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkyNjQ0NQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T02:15:38Z | 2020-10-09T02:15:38Z | OWNER | > FAILED tests/test_messages.py::test_messages_are_displayed_and_cleared - KeyError: 'ds_messages' That one is caused by `response.cookies` skipping cookies that were set to the empty string. Same fix as this: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/a1687351fb75b01f737fda4ad07e0781029de05c/tests/test_auth.py#L90-L95 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705937696 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705937696 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkzNzY5Ng== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T02:52:53Z | 2020-10-09T02:52:53Z | OWNER | These failures are giving me a severe "how did this ever work in the first place?" vibe: ``` FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys-https://example.com/] FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys/a,a,a-https://example.com/] FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/paginated_view-https://example.com/] FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_base_url_config[/fixtures/facetable-https://example.com/] ``` I have a fix for them, no idea why they weren't already failing though. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705940507 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705940507 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTk0MDUwNw== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T03:04:15Z | 2020-10-09T03:04:15Z | OWNER | This is really weird: new set of test failures that I wasn't seeing before, and those tests aren't failing on my laptop: ``` =========================== short test summary info ============================ FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_table_with_slashes_in_name - assert 404 == 200 FAILED tests/test_api.py::test_row_strange_table_name - assert 404 == 200 FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_row_strange_table_name_with_url_hash - assert... FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_css_classes_on_body[/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv-expected_classes5] FAILED tests/test_html.py::test_templates_considered[/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv-table-fixtures-tablewithslashescsv-fa7563.html, *table.html] ================== 5 failed, 738 passed in 194.73s (0:03:14) =================== ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705941580 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705941580 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTk0MTU4MA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T03:08:43Z | 2020-10-09T03:08:43Z | OWNER | Most likely reason for those failures is that `path` and `raw_path` are not being simulated correctly. I used to do those here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/402cf870b7d65f9b5fba9e23aa99433294bd4523/datasette/utils/testing.py#L116-L125 But now I'm delegating that to `httpx` to handle. WEIRD that it passes on my laptop but fails in GitHub Actions CI though. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705945591 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705945591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTk0NTU5MQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T03:24:48Z | 2020-10-09T03:24:48Z | OWNER | I'm testing this with a `print(scope)` and `pytest -k test_table_with_slashes_in_name -s`. Against the `main` branch: `{'type': 'http', 'http_version': '1.0', 'method': 'GET', 'path': '/fixtures/table/with/slashes.csv', 'raw_path': b'/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv', 'query_string': b'_shape=objects&_format=json', 'headers': [[b'host', b'localhost']], 'csrftoken': <function asgi_csrf_decorator.<locals>._asgi_csrf_decorator.<locals>.app_wrapped_with_csrf.<locals>.get_csrftoken at 0x10e2e6040>}` Against the broken branch: `tests/test_api.py {'type': 'http', 'asgi': {'version': '3.0'}, 'http_version': '1.1', 'method': 'GET', 'headers': [(b'host', b'localhost'), (b'accept', b'*/*'), (b'accept-encoding', b'gzip, deflate'), (b'connection', b'keep-alive'), (b'user-agent', b'python-httpx/0.15.0')], 'scheme': 'http', 'path': '/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv', 'query_string': b'_shape=objects&_format=json', 'server': ('localhost', None), 'client': ('127.0.0.1', 123), 'root_path': '', 'csrftoken': <function asgi_csrf_decorator.<locals>._asgi_csrf_decorator.<locals>.app_wrapped_with_csrf.<locals>.get_csrftoken at 0x109e0eca0>}` This is on my laptop though so both of those pass the tests. Key difference: the `httpx` version doesn't set a `raw_path` at all. BUT.. it does set `path` and sets it to `'/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv'` The non-httpx version sets `raw_path` to `b'/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv'` and `path` to `'/fixtures/table/with/slashes.csv'`. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705946120 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705946120 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTk0NjEyMA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T03:27:05Z | 2020-10-09T03:27:05Z | OWNER | I may need to fuss around with how the `httpx` client sends things to the ASGI app. https://github.com/encode/httpx/blob/92ca4d0cc654859fc2257c492e55d8752370d427/httpx/_transports/asgi.py#L26 is relevant: Alternatively, you can setup the transport instance explicitly. This allows you to include any additional configuration arguments specific to the ASGITransport class: ``` transport = httpx.ASGITransport( app=app, root_path="/submount", client=("1.2.3.4", 123) ) client = httpx.AsyncClient(transport=transport) ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-705946360 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 705946360 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTk0NjM2MA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T03:28:08Z | 2020-10-09T03:28:08Z | OWNER | Here's where `httpx` sets up the ASGI scope: https://github.com/encode/httpx/blob/92ca4d0cc654859fc2257c492e55d8752370d427/httpx/_transports/asgi.py#L82-L97 ```python # ASGI scope. scheme, host, port, full_path = url path, _, query = full_path.partition(b"?") scope = { "type": "http", "asgi": {"version": "3.0"}, "http_version": "1.1", "method": method.decode(), "headers": [(k.lower(), v) for (k, v) in headers], "scheme": scheme.decode("ascii"), "path": unquote(path.decode("ascii")), "query_string": query, "server": (host.decode("ascii"), port), "client": self.client, "root_path": self.root_path, } ``` Sure enough, it doesn't set the `raw_path`. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-706263157 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 706263157 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjI2MzE1Nw== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T15:57:15Z | 2020-10-09T15:57:15Z | OWNER | My `httpx` pull request adding `raw_path` support was just merged: https://github.com/encode/httpx/pull/1357 - but it's not in a release yet. I'm going to mark these tests as `xfail` so I can land this change - I'll remove that once an `httpx` release comes out that I can use to get the tests passing. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-706269271 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1000 | 706269271 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjI2OTI3MQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T16:08:49Z | 2020-10-09T16:08:49Z | OWNER | I'm going to document this in a separate issue. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717746043 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1006#issuecomment-706270877 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1006 | 706270877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjI3MDg3Nw== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T16:12:09Z | 2020-10-09T16:12:09Z | OWNER | This can become a section on https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/internals.html | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 718264811 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1003#issuecomment-706272322 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1003 | 706272322 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjI3MjMyMg== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T16:14:56Z | 2020-10-09T16:14:56Z | OWNER | Yes I think that makes sense. I added `json` to the template context in Dogsheep Beta just a few days ago because I needed that: https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/blob/bed9df2b3ef68189e2e445427721a28f4e9b4887/dogsheep_beta/__init__.py#L176 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 718238967 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1003#issuecomment-706273211 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1003 | 706273211 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjI3MzIxMQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T16:16:38Z | 2020-10-09T16:16:38Z | OWNER | I'm not a huge fan of `from_json` as the name for this. Some other options: - Expose `json` directly so templates can do `json.loads()` and `json.dumps()` - this allows for outputting JSON too, which is useful. But is there anything else on the `json` module that shouldn't be exposed in templates? - `json_dumps()` and `json_loads()` template functions. I quite like that. - Something else? | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 718238967 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1007#issuecomment-706276831 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1007 | 706276831 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjI3NjgzMQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T16:23:51Z | 2020-10-09T16:23:51Z | OWNER | I don't appear to be using these anywhere, not sure why I spotted a warning (which I now can't find). | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 718272593 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1003#issuecomment-706281451 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1003 | 706281451 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjI4MTQ1MQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T16:33:01Z | 2020-10-09T16:33:01Z | OWNER | I think `json_dumps()` and `json_loads()` as aliases for `json.dumps()` and `json.loads()` is the way to go here. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 718238967 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1006#issuecomment-706305601 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1006 | 706305601 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjMwNTYwMQ== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T17:22:31Z | 2020-10-09T17:22:31Z | OWNER | https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/internals.html#client | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 718264811 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/943#issuecomment-706305784 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/943 | 706305784 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjMwNTc4NA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T17:22:55Z | 2020-10-09T17:22:55Z | OWNER | Documentation (from #1006): https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/internals.html#client | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 681375466 | |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1002#issuecomment-706306214 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1002 | 706306214 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjMwNjIxNA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T17:23:51Z | 2020-10-09T17:23:51Z | OWNER | I can start by combining the release notes for the 0.50 alphas. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717783692 |