issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 1193090967
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
| id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1092321966 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092321966 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BG4Ku | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-08T00:20:32Z | 2022-04-08T00:20:56Z | OWNER | If we do this I'm keen to have it be more than just an alternative to the existing `sqlite-utils` command - especially since if I add `sqlite-utils` as a dependency of Datasette in the future that command will be installed as part of `pip install datasette` anyway. My best thought on how to differentiate them so far is plugins: if Datasette plugins that provide alternative outputs - like `.geojson` and `.yml` and suchlike - also work for the `datasette query` command that would make a lot of sense to me. One way that could work: a `--fmt geojson` option to this command which uses the plugin that was registered for the specified extension. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
| 1092357672 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092357672 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHA4o | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-08T01:39:40Z | 2022-04-08T01:39:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR | > My best thought on how to differentiate them so far is plugins: if Datasette plugins that provide alternative outputs - like .geojson and .yml and suchlike - also work for the datasette query command that would make a lot of sense to me. That's my thinking, too. It's really the thing I've been wanting since writing `datasette-geojson`, since I'm always exporting with `datasette --get`. The workflow I'm always looking for is something like this: ```sh cd alltheplaces-datasette datasette query dunkin_in_suffolk -f geojson -o dunkin_in_suffolk.geojson ``` I think this probably needs either a new plugin hook separate from `register_output_renderer` or a way to use that without going through the HTTP stack. Or maybe a render mode that writes to a stream instead of a response. Maybe there's a new key in the dictionary that `register_output_renderer` returns that handles CLI exports. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
| 1092361727 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092361727 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHB3_ | simonw 9599 | 2022-04-08T01:47:43Z | 2022-04-08T01:47:43Z | OWNER | A render mode for that plugin hook that writes to a stream is exactly what I have in mind: - #1062 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
| 1092370880 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092370880 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHEHA | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-08T02:07:40Z | 2022-04-08T02:07:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR | So maybe `render_output_render` returns something like this: ```python @hookimpl def register_output_renderer(datasette): return { "extension": "geojson", "render": render_geojson, "stream": stream_geojson, "can_render": can_render_geojson, } ``` And stream gets an iterator, instead of a list of rows, so it can efficiently handle large queries. Maybe it also gets passed a destination stream, or it returns an iterator. I'm not sure what makes more sense. Either way, that might cover both CLI exports and streaming responses. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
| 1092386254 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092386254 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHH3O | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-08T02:39:25Z | 2022-04-08T02:39:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | And just to think this through a little more, here's what `stream_geojson` might look like: ```python async def stream_geojson(datasette, columns, rows, database, stream): db = datasette.get_database(database) for row in rows: feature = await row_to_geojson(row, db) stream.write(feature + "\n") # just assuming newline mode for now ``` Alternately, that could be an async generator, like this: ```python async def stream_geojson(datasette, columns, rows, database): db = datasette.get_database(database) for row in rows: feature = await row_to_geojson(row, db) yield feature ``` Not sure which makes more sense, but I think this pattern would open up a lot of possibility. If you had your [stream_indented_json](https://til.simonwillison.net/python/output-json-array-streaming) function, you could do `yield from stream_indented_json(rows, 2)` and be one your way. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 | |
| 1094453751 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1094453751 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BPAn3 | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-04-11T01:32:12Z | 2022-04-11T01:32:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Was looking through old issues and realized a bunch of this got discussed in #1101 (including by me!), so sorry to rehash all this. Happy to help with whatever piece of it I can. Would be very excited to be able to use format plugins with exports. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Proposal: datasette query 1193090967 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);