issue_comments
5 rows where user = 418191
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, issue, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
| id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 422821483 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/329#issuecomment-422821483 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/329 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMjgyMTQ4Mw== | jaywgraves 418191 | 2018-09-19T14:17:42Z | 2018-09-19T14:17:42Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm using the docker image (0.23.2) and notice some differences/bugs between the docs and the published version with canned queries. (submitted a tiny doc fix also) I was able to build the docker container locally using `master` and I'm using that for now. Would it be possible to manually push 0.24 to DockerHub until the TravisCI stuff is fixed? I would like to run this in our Kubernetes cluster but don't want to publish a version in our internal registry if I don't have to. Thanks! | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Travis should push tagged images to Docker Hub for each release 336465018 | |
| 422915450 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/329#issuecomment-422915450 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/329 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMjkxNTQ1MA== | jaywgraves 418191 | 2018-09-19T18:45:02Z | 2018-09-20T10:50:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | That works for me. Was able to pull the public image and no errors on my canned query. (~although a small rendering bug. I'll create an issue and if I have time today, a PR to fix~ this turned out to be my error.) Thanks for the quick response! | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Travis should push tagged images to Docker Hub for each release 336465018 | |
| 582105810 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/653#issuecomment-582105810 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/653 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU4MjEwNTgxMA== | jaywgraves 418191 | 2020-02-04T20:43:01Z | 2020-02-04T20:43:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I *think* the existing code will be OK even if I strip the lines in the middle of a new line delimited string. It's only used for the validation, SQLite handles the `--` just fine and the whole SQL textarea still gets sent once it passes validation. I can add your test case to my branch later this evening though. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | allow leading comments in SQL input field 541331755 | |
| 582106085 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/653#issuecomment-582106085 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/653 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU4MjEwNjA4NQ== | jaywgraves 418191 | 2020-02-04T20:43:43Z | 2020-02-04T20:43:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | but this also doesn't have to land at all if it doesn't match your use case. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | allow leading comments in SQL input field 541331755 | |
| 950150483 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1401#issuecomment-950150483 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1401 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c44oiVT | jaywgraves 418191 | 2021-10-23T13:09:10Z | 2021-10-23T13:09:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think it's because of this in `app.css` ``` ol, ul { list-style: none; } ``` https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blame/main/datasette/static/app.css#L35-L38 You could probably reinstate that by providing your own CSS. https://docs.datasette.io/en/0.24/custom_templates.html#custom-css-and-javascript | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | unordered list is not rendering bullet points in description_html on database page 950664971 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);