issues: 1083921371
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1083921371 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Am1Pb | 1570 | Separate db.execute_write() into three methods | 9599 | closed | 0 | 7571612 | 2 | 2021-12-18T18:45:54Z | 2022-01-13T22:27:38Z | 2021-12-18T18:57:25Z | OWNER | > Rather than adding a `executemany=True` parameter, I'm now thinking a better design might be to have three methods: > > - `db.execute_write(sql, params=None, block=False)` > - `db.execute_write_script(sql, block=False)` > - `db.execute_write_many(sql, params_seq, block=False)` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997267416_ | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1570/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed |