issues: 1175690070
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1175690070 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE5tW | 1676 | Reconsider ensure_permissions() logic, can it be less confusing? | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 3 | 2022-03-21T17:14:57Z | 2022-12-02T01:23:40Z | OWNER | > Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/docs/internals.rst#await-ensure_permissionsactor-permissions > >> This method allows multiple permissions to be checked at onced. It raises a `datasette.Forbidden` exception if any of the checks are denied before one of them is explicitly granted. >> >> This is useful when you need to check multiple permissions at once. For example, an actor should be able to view a table if either one of the following checks returns `True` or not a single one of them returns `False`: > > That's pretty hard to understand! I'm going to open a separate issue to reconsider if this is a useful enough abstraction given how confusing it is. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1675#issuecomment-1074177827_ | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1676/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |