issues: 1175894898
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1175894898 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFrty | 1680 | Consider simplifying permissions for 1.0 | 9599 | open | 0 | 3268330 | 0 | 2022-03-21T20:17:29Z | 2022-03-21T20:17:29Z | OWNER | Permission checks right now can express one of three opinions: - `False` means "so not grant this permisson" - `True` means "grant this permission" - `None` means "I have no opinion" But... there's also a concept of a "default" for a given permission check, which might be `False` or `True`. I worry this is too complicated. Could this be simplified before 1.0? In particular the default concept. See also: - #1676 | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1680/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |