issues: 1430797211
This data as json
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1430797211 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VSDub | 1875 | Figure out design for JSON errors (consider RFC 7807) | 9599 | open | 0 | 8755003 | 7 | 2022-11-01T03:14:15Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:08Z | OWNER | https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis/ is a brand new standard. Since I need a neat, predictable format for my JSON errors, maybe I should use this one? | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1875/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |