issues: 1805076818
This data as json
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1805076818 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5rl0lS | 2102 | API tokens with view-table but not view-database/view-instance cannot access the table | 9599 | open | 0 | 7 | 2023-07-14T15:34:27Z | 2023-07-18T11:47:21Z | OWNER | > Spotted a problem while working on this: if you grant a token access to view table for a specific table but don't also grant view database and view instance permissions, that token is useless. > > This was a deliberate design decision in Datasette - it's documented on https://docs.datasette.io/en/1.0a2/authentication.html#access-permissions-in-metadata > >> If a user cannot access a specific database, they will not be able to access tables, views or queries within that database. If a user cannot access the instance they will not be able to access any of the databases, tables, views or queries. > > I'm now second-guessing if this was a good decision. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens/issues/7#issuecomment-1636031702_ | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2102/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |