issues: 1876353656
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1876353656 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5v1uJ4 | 2168 | Consider a request/response wrapping hook slightly higher level than asgi_wrapper() | 9599 | open | 0 | 6 | 2023-08-31T21:42:04Z | 2023-09-10T17:54:08Z | OWNER | There's a long justification for why this might be needed here: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-tokens/issues/10#issuecomment-1701820001 Short version: it would be neat if it was possible to stash some data on the `request` object such that a later plugin/middleware-type-thing could use that to influence the final returned response - similar to the kinds of things you can do with Django middleware. The `asgi_wrapper()` mechanism doesn't have access to the request or response objects - it gets `scope` and can mess around with `receive` and `send`, but those are pretty low-level primitives. Since Datasette has well-defined `request` and `response` objects now it might be nice to have a middleware layer that can manipulate those directly. | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2168/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |