issues: 1884330740
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1884330740 | PR_kwDOBm6k_c5ZszDF | 2174 | Use $DATASETTE_INTERNAL in absence of --internal | 15178711 | open | 0 | 3 | 2023-09-06T16:07:15Z | 2023-09-08T00:46:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | simonw/datasette/pulls/2174 | #refs 2157, specifically [this comment](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2157#issuecomment-1700291967) Passing in `--internal my_internal.db` over and over again can get repetitive. This PR adds a new configurable env variable `DATASETTE_INTERNAL_DB_PATH`. If it's defined, then it takes place as the path to the internal database. Users can still overwrite this behavior by passing in their own `--internal internal.db` flag. In draft mode for now, needs tests and documentation. Side note: Maybe we can have a sections in the docs that lists all the "configuration environment variables" that Datasette respects? I did a quick grep and found: - `DATASETTE_LOAD_PLUGINS` - `DATASETTE_SECRETS` <!-- readthedocs-preview datasette start --> ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--2174.org.readthedocs.build/en/2174/ <!-- readthedocs-preview datasette end --> | 107914493 | pull | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2174/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 0 |