issues: 465327844
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 465327844 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ= | 553 | Potential improvements to facet-by-date | 9599 | open | 0 | 3 | 2019-07-08T15:37:53Z | 2019-07-08T15:41:55Z | OWNER | In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696 > I think for date facets, it might be more meaningful to order them by date, rather than by size? Or offer both? I'm *definitely* often interested in size-over-time, so https://data.rixx.de/django_tickets/tickets?_facet_date=created#facet-created … isn't all that helpful! Screenshot of that link: <img width="1092" alt="django_tickets__tickets__29_846_rows" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/60823090-9f680100-a15b-11e9-84e9-52b9d666e90f.png"> | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |