issues: 685806511
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 685806511 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODU4MDY1MTE= | 950 | Private/secret databases: database files that are only visible to plugins | 9599 | open | 0 | 5 | 2020-08-25T20:46:17Z | 2020-08-26T00:50:48Z | OWNER | In thinking about the best way to implement https://github.com/simonw/datasette-auth-passwords/issues/6 (SQL-backed user accounts for `datasette-auth-passwords`) I realized that there are a few different use-cases where a plugin might want to store data that isn't visible to regular Datasette users: - Storing password hashes - Storing API tokens - Storing secrets that are used for data import integrations (secrets for talking to the Twitter API for example) Idea: allow one or more private database files to be attached to Datasette, something like this: datasette github.db linkedin.db -s secrets.db -m metadata.yml The `secrets.db` file would not be visible using any of the Datasette's usual interface or API routes - but plugins would be able to run queries against it. So `datasette-auth-passwords` might then be configured like this: ```yaml plugins: datasette-auth-passwords: database: secrets sql: "select password_hash from passwords where username = :username" ``` The plugin could even refuse to operate against a database that hadn't been loaded as a secret database. | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/950/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |