issues: 772438273
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 772438273 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NzI0MzgyNzM= | 1157 | Use time.perf_counter() instead of time.time() to measure performance | 9599 | closed | 0 | 6346396 | 1 | 2020-12-21T20:21:41Z | 2021-01-24T21:20:42Z | 2020-12-21T21:49:20Z | OWNER | I do that in a bunch of places: https://ripgrep.datasette.io/-/ripgrep?pattern=time%28%29&literal=on&glob=datasette%2F%2A%2A https://docs.python.org/3/library/time.html#time.perf_counter > `time.``perf_counter`() → float > > Return the value (in fractional seconds) of a performance counter, i.e. a clock with the highest available resolution to measure a short duration. It does include time elapsed during sleep and is system-wide. The reference point of the returned value is undefined, so that only the difference between the results of consecutive calls is valid. > > _New in version 3.3._ | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1157/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed |