issues: 777333388
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 777333388 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NzczMzMzODg= | 1168 | Mechanism for storing metadata in _metadata tables | 9599 | open | 0 | 21 | 2021-01-01T18:47:27Z | 2023-09-28T18:29:05Z | OWNER | _Original title: Perhaps metadata should all live in a `_metadata` in-memory database_ Inspired by #1150 - metadata should be exposed as an API, and for large Datasette instances that API may need to be paginated. So why not expose it through an in-memory database table? One catch to this: plugins. #860 aims to add a plugin hook for metadata. But if the metadata comes from an in-memory table, how do the plugins interact with it? The need to paginate over metadata does make a plugin hook that returns metadata for an individual table seem less wise, since we don't want to have to do 10,000 plugin hook invocations to show a list of all metadata. If those plugins write directly to the in-memory table how can their contributions survive the server restarting? | 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1168/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |