issues
19 rows where milestone = 8755003
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: state, comments, updated_at, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
| id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 627794879 | MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjc3OTQ4Nzk= | 782 | Redesign default .json format | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 54 | 2020-05-30T18:47:07Z | 2023-01-17T02:05:45Z | OWNER | The default JSON just isn't right. I find myself using `?_shape=array` for almost everything I build against the API. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1197926598 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZujG | 1705 | How to upgrade your plugin for 1.0 documentation | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-04-08T23:16:47Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:05Z | OWNER | Among other things, needed by: - #1704 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1705/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1200649124 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHOk | 1708 | Datasette 1.0 alpha upcoming release notes | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 2 | 2022-04-11T22:57:12Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:06Z | OWNER | I'm going to try writing the release notes first, to see if that helps unblock me. # ⚠️ Any release notes in this issue are a draft, and should not be treated as the real thing ⚠️ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1708/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1200649502 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHUe | 1709 | Redesigned JSON API with ?_extra= parameters | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-04-11T22:57:49Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:06Z | OWNER | This will be the single biggest breaking change for the 1.0 release. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1709/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1200650491 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHj7 | 1711 | Template context powered entirely by the JSON API format | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-04-11T22:59:27Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:06Z | OWNER | Datasette 1.0 will have a stable template context. I'm going to achieve this by refactoring the templates to work only with keys returned by the API (or some of its extras) - then the API documentation will double up as template documentation. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1711/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1216436131 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5IgVej | 1721 | Implement plugin hooks: `register_table_extras`, `register_row_extras`, `register_query_extras` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 0 | 2022-04-26T20:21:49Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:07Z | OWNER | Designed in: - #1720 Part of: - #262 - #1709 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1721/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1219385669 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5IrllF | 1729 | Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 12 | 2022-04-28T22:28:14Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:07Z | OWNER | Part of: - #262 - #1518 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1426080014 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAEEO | 1867 | /db/table/-/rename API (also allows atomic replace) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-10-27T18:13:23Z | 2023-01-09T15:34:12Z | OWNER | > There's one catch with batched inserts: if your CLI tool fails half way through you could end up with a partially populated table - since a bunch of batches will have succeeded first. > > ... > > If people care about that kind of thing they could always push all of their inserts to a table called `_tablename` and then atomically rename that once they've uploaded all of the data (assuming I provide an atomic-rename-this-table mechanism). _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1866#issuecomment-1293893789_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1867/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1428630253 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VJyrt | 1873 | Ensure insert API has good tests for rowid and compound primark key tables | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 11 | 2022-10-30T06:22:17Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:08Z | OWNER | Following: - #1866 I need to design and implement various edge-cases or primary keys: - Table without an auto-incrementing primary key - Table with compound primary keys - Table with just a `rowid` | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1873/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | reopened | ||||||
| 1430797211 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5VSDub | 1875 | Figure out design for JSON errors (consider RFC 7807) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 7 | 2022-11-01T03:14:15Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:08Z | OWNER | https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis/ is a brand new standard. Since I need a neat, predictable format for my JSON errors, maybe I should use this one? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1875/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1447465004 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRpAs | 1889 | Ability to create new tokens via the API | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 0 | 2022-11-14T06:21:36Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:08Z | OWNER | Refs: - #1850 Initially I decided that the API shouldn't be able to create new tokens at all - I don't like the idea of an API token holder creating themselves additional tokens. Then I realized that two of the API features are specifically more useful if you can generate fresh tokens via the API: - Tokes that expire after a time limit are MUCH more useful if they can be automatically generated - Likewise, tokens that are restricted to a subset of permissions (see #1855) make more sense to be generated like this, especially in conjunction with expiry times | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1889/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1468495358 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh3X- | 1910 | Check incoming column types on various write APIs | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 0 | 2022-11-29T18:09:10Z | 2022-12-13T05:29:09Z | OWNER | > I do think this needs type checking - I just tried and you really can send a string to an integer column and have it work, which feels bad. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1331089156_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1910/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1468689139 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ximrz | 1914 | Finalize design of JSON for Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-11-29T20:59:10Z | 2022-12-13T06:15:54Z | OWNER | Tracking issue. - [ ] #1709 - [ ] #1729 - [ ] #1875 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1914/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1490576818 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Y2GWy | 1943 | `/-/permissions` should list available permissions | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-12-11T23:38:03Z | 2022-12-15T00:41:37Z | OWNER | > Idea: a `/-/permissions` introspection endpoint for listing registered permissions _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1939#issuecomment-1345691103_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1943/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1493471221 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZBI_1 | 1949 | `.json` errors should be returned as JSON | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 10 | 2022-12-13T06:14:12Z | 2022-12-15T00:46:27Z | OWNER | Eg the error in this issue: - #1945 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1949/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1495716243 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZJtGT | 1952 | Improvements to /-/create-token restrictions interface | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2022-12-14T05:22:39Z | 2022-12-14T05:23:13Z | OWNER | > It would be neat not to show write permissions against immutable databases too - and not hard from a performance perspective since it doesn't involve hundreds more permission checks. > > That will need permissions to grow a flag for if they need a mutable database though, which is a bigger job. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1947#issuecomment-1350414402_ Also, DO show the `_memory` database there if Datasette was started in `--crossdb` mode. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1952/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1633077183 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5hVse_ | 2041 | Remove obsolete table POST code | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 2 | 2023-03-21T01:01:40Z | 2023-03-21T01:17:44Z | 2023-03-21T01:17:43Z | OWNER | Spotted this in: - #1999 `POST /db/table` currently executes obsolete code for inserting a row - I replaced that with `/db/table/-/insert` in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/6e788b49edf4f842c0817f006eb9d865778eea5e but forgot to remove the old code. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2041/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
| 1646734246 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5iJyum | 2049 | Custom SQL queries should use new JSON ?_extra= format | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 4 | 2023-03-30T00:42:53Z | 2023-04-05T23:29:27Z | OWNER | Related: - #262 I've made the change to the table view, now I need the new format to work for arbitrary SQL queries too. Note that this incorporates both arbitrary SQL queries and canned queries. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2049/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
| 1649791661 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5iVdKt | 2050 | Row page JSON should use new ?_extra= format | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0a3 8755003 | 1 | 2023-03-31T17:56:53Z | 2023-03-31T17:59:49Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable/2.json Related: - #2049 - #1709 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2050/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] (
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[number] INTEGER,
[title] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[state] TEXT,
[locked] INTEGER,
[assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
[comments] INTEGER,
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[closed_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[pull_request] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
[type] TEXT
, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
ON [issues] ([user]);