issues
110 rows where milestone = 3268330
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, state, comments, author_association, type, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id ▼ | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | pull_request | body | repo | type | active_lock_reason | performed_via_github_app | reactions | draft | state_reason |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
323658641 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM2NTg2NDE= | 262 | Add ?_extra= mechanism for requesting extra properties in JSON | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 27 | 2018-05-16T14:55:42Z | 2023-03-29T06:22:22Z | OWNER | Datasette views currently work by creating a set of data that should be returned as JSON, then defining an additional, optional `template_data()` function which is called if the view is being rendered as HTML. This `template_data()` function calculates extra template context variables which are necessary for the HTML view but should not be included in the JSON. Example of how that is used today: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/2b79f2bdeb1efa86e0756e741292d625f91cb93d/datasette/views/table.py#L672-L704 With features like Facets in #255 I'm beginning to want to move more items into the `template_data()` - in the case of facets it's the `suggested_facets` array. This saves that feature from being calculated (involving several SQL queries) for the JSON case where it is unlikely to be used. But... as an API user, I want to still optionally be able to access that information. Solution: Add a `?_extra=suggested_facets&_extra=table_metadata` argument which can be used to optionally request additional blocks to be added to the JSON API. Then redefine as many of the current `template_data()` features as extra arguments instead, and teach Datasette to return certain extras by default when rendering templates. This could allow the JSON representation to be slimmed down further (removing e.g. the `table_definition` and `view_definition` keys) while still making that information available to API users who need it. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/262/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
324188953 | MDU6SXNzdWUzMjQxODg5NTM= | 272 | Port Datasette to ASGI | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 42 | 2018-05-17T21:16:32Z | 2019-06-24T04:54:15Z | 2019-06-24T03:33:06Z | OWNER | Datasette doesn't take much advantage of Sanic, and I'm increasingly having to work around parts of it because of idiosyncrasies that are specific to Datasette - caring about the exact order of querystring arguments for example. Since Datasette is GET-only our needs from a web framework are actually pretty slim. This becomes more important as I expand the plugins #14 framework. Am I sure I want the plugin ecosystem to depend on a Sanic if I might move away from it in the future? If Datasette wasn't all about async/await I would use WSGI, but today it makes more sense to use ASGI. I'd like to be confident that switching to ASGI would still give me the excellent performance that Sanic provides. https://github.com/django/asgiref/blob/master/specs/asgi.rst | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/272/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | ||||
374953006 | MDU6SXNzdWUzNzQ5NTMwMDY= | 369 | Interface should show same JSON shape options for custom SQL queries | gfrmin 416374 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2018-10-29T10:39:15Z | 2020-05-30T17:24:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | At the moment the page returning a custom SQL query shows the JSON and CSV APIs, but not the multiple JSON shapes. However, adding the `_shape` parameter to the JSON API URL manually still works, so perhaps there should be consistency in the interface by having the same "Advanced Export" box for custom SQL queries. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/369/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
398011658 | MDU6SXNzdWUzOTgwMTE2NTg= | 398 | Ensure downloading a 100+MB SQLite database file works | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2019-01-10T20:57:52Z | 2020-12-05T19:36:27Z | 2020-12-05T19:36:27Z | OWNER | I've seen attempted downloads of large files fail after about ten seconds. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/398/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
440134714 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDAxMzQ3MTQ= | 446 | Define mechanism for plugins to return structured data | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 7 | 2019-05-03T17:00:16Z | 2020-10-02T00:08:54Z | 2020-10-02T00:08:47Z | OWNER | Several plugin hooks now expect plugins to return data in a specific shape - notably the new output format hook and the custom facet hook. These use Python dictionaries right now but that's quite error prone: it would be good to have a mechanism that supported a more structured format. Full list of current hooks is here: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins.html#plugin-hooks | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/446/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
440222719 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDAyMjI3MTk= | 448 | _facet_array should work against views | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2019-05-03T21:08:04Z | 2021-11-16T01:32:05Z | 2021-11-16T01:19:40Z | OWNER | I created this view: https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads-8dbda00/ads_with_targets ``` CREATE VIEW ads_with_targets as select ads.*, json_group_array(targets.name) as target_names from ads join ad_targets on ad_targets.ad_id = ads.id join targets on ad_targets.target_id = targets.id group by ad_targets.ad_id ``` When I try to apply faceting by array it appears to work at first: https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads/ads_with_targets?_facet_array=target_names But actually it's doing the wrong thing - the SQL for the facets uses rowid, but rowid is not present on views at all! These results are incorrect, and clicking to select a facet will fail to produce any rows: https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads/ads_with_targets?_facet_array=target_names&target_names__arraycontains=people_who_match%3Ainterests%3AAfrican-American+Civil+Rights+Movement+%281954%E2%80%9468%29 Here's the SQL it should be using when you select a facet (note that it does not use a rowid): https://json-view-facet-bug-demo-j7hipcg4aq-uc.a.run.app/russian-ads?sql=select+*+from+ads_with_targets+where+id+in+%28%0D%0A++++++++++++select+ads_with_targets.id+from+ads_with_targets%2C+json_each%28ads_with_targets.target_names%29+j%0D%0A++++++++++++where+j.value+%3D+%3Ap0%0D%0A++++++++%29+limit+101&p0=people_who_match%3Ainterests%3ABlack+%28Color%29 So we need to do something a lot smarter here. I'm not sure what the fix will look like, or even if it's feasible given that views don't have a rowid to hook into so the JSON faceting SQL may have to be completely rewritten. ``` datasette publish cloudrun \ russian-ads.db \ --name json-view-facet-bug-demo \ --branch master \ --extra-options "--config sql_time_limit_ms:5000 --config facet_time_limit_ms:5000" ``` | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/448/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
443021509 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDMwMjE1MDk= | 461 | Paginate + search for databases/tables on the homepage | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-05-11T18:05:34Z | 2020-12-17T22:14:46Z | OWNER | Split out from #460 - in order to support large numbers of connected databases the homepage needs to be paginated. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/461/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
444746021 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDQ3NDYwMjE= | 468 | Pagination for the database index page | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2019-05-16T04:13:56Z | 2020-10-16T23:20:26Z | 2020-10-16T23:20:22Z | OWNER | Some databases have a LOT of tables. Now that we often calculate table row counts dynamically we could really speed things up by paginating the database index page, e.g. http://fivethirtyeight-datasette.herokuapp.com/fivethirtyeight If we're paginating, having a filter-search-for-table widget (similar to the search-for-database widget I'm planning for the homepage) would make sense. Related: pagination for homepage #461 and Datasette Library #417 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/468/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
449854604 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk4NTQ2MDQ= | 492 | Facets not correctly persisted in hidden form fields | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-05-29T14:49:39Z | 2020-09-15T20:12:29Z | 2020-09-15T20:12:29Z | OWNER | Steps to reproduce: visit https://2a4b892.datasette.io/fixtures/roadside_attractions?_facet_m2m=attraction_characteristic and click "Apply" Result is a 500: `no such column: attraction_characteristic` The error occurs because of this hidden HTML input: <input type="hidden" name="_facet" value="attraction_characteristic"> This should be: <input type="hidden" name="_facet_m2m" value="attraction_characteristic"> | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/492/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
449886319 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NDk4ODYzMTk= | 493 | Rename metadata.json to config.json | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 6 | 2019-05-29T15:48:03Z | 2020-12-18T20:34:39Z | OWNER | It is increasingly being useful configuration options, when it started out as purely metadata. Could cause confusion with the `--config` mechanism though - maybe that should be called "settings" instead? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
456568880 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTY1Njg4ODA= | 509 | Support opening multiple databases with the same stem | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-06-15T19:32:00Z | 2020-12-22T20:04:35Z | 2020-12-22T20:04:35Z | OWNER | e.g. I should be able to do this: datasette App/data.db Other_App/data.db This currently errors because you can't have two databases taking the `/data` URL path. Instead, how about in this particular case assigning the second database `/data-1`? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/509/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | ||||
459587155 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjkwODk3MTA0 | 518 | Port Datasette from Sanic to ASGI + Uvicorn | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | simonw 9599 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2019-06-23T15:18:42Z | 2019-06-24T13:42:50Z | 2019-06-24T03:13:09Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/518 | Most of the code here was fleshed out in comments on #272 (Port Datasette to ASGI) - this pull request will track the final pieces: - [x] Update test harness to more correctly simulate the `raw_path` issue - [x] Use `raw_path` so table names containing `/` can work correctly - [x] Bug: JSON not served with correct content-type - [x] Get ?_trace=1 working again - [x] Replacement for `@app.listener("before_server_start")` - [x] Bug: `/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv?_format=json` downloads as CSV - [x] Replace Sanic request and response objects with my own classes, so I can remove Sanic dependency - [x] Final code tidy-up before merging to master | datasette 107914493 | pull | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/518/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 0 | |||
459590021 | MDU6SXNzdWU0NTk1OTAwMjE= | 519 | Decide what goes into Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2019-06-23T15:47:41Z | 2021-11-15T23:26:11Z | 2021-11-15T23:26:11Z | OWNER | Datasette ASGI #272 is a big part of it... but 1.0 will generally be an indicator that Datasette is a stable platform for developers to write plugins and custom templates against. So lots to think about. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/519/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
497170355 | MDU6SXNzdWU0OTcxNzAzNTU= | 576 | Documented internals API for use in plugins | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 10 | 2019-09-23T15:28:50Z | 2021-01-05T23:12:51Z | 2021-01-05T23:12:37Z | OWNER | Quite a few of the plugin hooks make a `datasette”`instance of the Datasette class available to the plugins, so that they can look up configuration settings and execute database queries. This means it should provide a documented, stable API so that plugin authors can rely on it. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/576/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
497171390 | MDU6SXNzdWU0OTcxNzEzOTA= | 577 | Utility mechanism for plugins to render templates | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 7 | 2019-09-23T15:30:36Z | 2020-02-04T20:26:20Z | 2020-02-04T20:26:19Z | OWNER | Sometimes a plugin will need to render a template for some custom UI. We need a documented API for doing this, which ensures that everything will work correctly if you extend base.html etc. See also #576. This could be a `.render()` method on the Datasette class, but that feels a bit weird - should that class also take responsibility for rendering? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/577/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
529429214 | MDU6SXNzdWU1Mjk0MjkyMTQ= | 642 | Provide a cookiecutter template for creating new plugins | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 6 | 2019-11-27T15:46:36Z | 2020-06-20T03:20:33Z | 2020-06-20T03:20:25Z | OWNER | See this conversation: https://twitter.com/psychemedia/status/1199707352540368896 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/642/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
531502365 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MzE1MDIzNjU= | 646 | Make database level information from metadata.json available in the index.html template | lagolucas 18017473 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2019-12-02T19:55:10Z | 2022-03-15T20:50:34Z | NONE | Did a search on the issues here and didn't find anything related to what I want. I want to have information that is on the database level of the JSON like title, source and source_url, and use it on the index page. I tried some small tweaks on the python and html files, but failed to get that result. Is there a way? Thanks! | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/646/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
531755959 | MDU6SXNzdWU1MzE3NTU5NTk= | 647 | Move hashed URL mode out to a plugin | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 9 | 2019-12-03T06:29:03Z | 2022-03-19T11:56:05Z | 2022-03-15T23:13:06Z | OWNER | They used to be the default until #418. Since making them optional I haven't felt the need to use them even once. That suggests to me that they should be removed. I think their effect could be entirely handled by an ASGI wrapping plugin. https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/0.32/performance.html#hashed-url-mode | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/647/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
542553350 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NDI1NTMzNTA= | 655 | Copy and paste doesn't work reliably on iPhone for SQL editor | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2019-12-26T13:15:10Z | 2020-09-30T20:36:12Z | 2020-08-30T17:51:40Z | OWNER | I'm having a lot of trouble copying and pasting from the codemirror editor on my iPhone. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/655/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
570101428 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mzc5MTkyMjU4 | 683 | .execute_write() and .execute_write_fn() methods on Database | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 14 | 2020-02-24T19:51:58Z | 2020-05-30T18:40:20Z | 2020-02-25T04:45:08Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/683 | See #682 - [x] Come up with design for `.execute_write()` and `.execute_write_fn()` - [x] Build some quick demo plugins to exercise the design - [x] Write some unit tests - [x] Write the documentation | datasette 107914493 | pull | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/683/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 0 | ||||
570301333 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzAzMDEzMzM= | 684 | Add documentation on Database introspection methods to internals.rst | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2020-02-25T04:20:24Z | 2020-06-04T18:56:15Z | 2020-05-30T18:40:39Z | OWNER | `internals.rst` will be landing as part of #683 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/684/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
570309546 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzAzMDk1NDY= | 685 | Document (and reconsider design of) Database.execute() and Database.execute_against_connection_in_thread() | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 15 | 2020-02-25T04:49:44Z | 2020-05-30T13:20:50Z | 2020-05-08T17:42:18Z | OWNER | In #683 I started a new section of internals documentation covering the `Database` class: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/internals.html#database-class I decided not to document `.execute()` and `.execute_against_connection_in_thread()` yet because I'm not 100% happy with their API design yet. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/685/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
576722115 | MDU6SXNzdWU1NzY3MjIxMTU= | 696 | Single failing unit test when run inside the Docker image | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2020-03-06T06:16:36Z | 2021-03-29T17:04:19Z | 2021-03-07T07:41:18Z | OWNER | ``` docker run -it -v `pwd`:/mnt datasetteproject/datasette:latest /bin/bash root@0e1928cfdf79:/# cd /mnt root@0e1928cfdf79:/mnt# pip install -e .[test] root@0e1928cfdf79:/mnt# pytest ``` I get one failure! It was for `test_searchable[/fixtures/searchable.json?_search=te*+AND+do*&_searchmode=raw-expected_rows3]` ``` def test_searchable(app_client, path, expected_rows): response = app_client.get(path) > assert expected_rows == response.json["rows"] E AssertionError: assert [[1, 'barry c...sel', 'puma']] == [] E Left contains 2 more items, first extra item: [1, 'barry cat', 'terry dog', 'panther'] E Full diff: E + [] E - [[1, 'barry cat', 'terry dog', 'panther'], E - [2, 'terry dog', 'sara weasel', 'puma']] ``` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/695#issuecomment-595614469_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/696/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
585633142 | MDU6SXNzdWU1ODU2MzMxNDI= | 706 | Documentation for the "request" object | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 6 | 2020-03-22T02:55:50Z | 2020-05-30T13:20:00Z | 2020-05-27T22:31:22Z | OWNER | Since that object is passed to the `extra_template_vars` hooks AND the classes registered by `register_facet_classes` it should be part of the documented interface on https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/stable/internals.html I could also start passing it to the `register_output_renderer` callback. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/706/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
607223136 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MDcyMjMxMzY= | 741 | Replace "datasette publish --extra-options" with "--setting" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 9 | 2020-04-27T04:29:04Z | 2022-05-12T19:21:16Z | OWNER | See https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-now/issues/9#issuecomment-618155764 - the `--extra-options` mechanism is in practice just used to set `--config` options in data that you publish, but that means you end up with pretty messy looking commands: datasette publish my.db --extra-options="--config default_page_size:50 --config sql_time_limit_ms:3500" A neater design would be to support `--config` as an option for `datasette publish` directly: datasette publish my.db --config default_page_size:50 --config sql_time_limit_ms:3500 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/741/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
626078521 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjYwNzg1MjE= | 774 | Consolidate request.raw_args and request.args | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 8 | 2020-05-27T22:30:59Z | 2020-05-29T23:27:35Z | 2020-05-29T23:22:38Z | OWNER | `request.raw_args` is not documented, and I'd like to remove it entirely. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/706#issuecomment-634975252_ I use it in a few places in other projects though, so I'll have to fix those first: https://github.com/search?q=user%3Asimonw+raw_args&type=Code | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/774/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
626593402 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MjY1OTM0MDI= | 780 | Internals documentation for datasette.metadata() method | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2020-05-28T15:14:22Z | 2022-03-15T20:50:34Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/40885ef24e32d91502b6b8bbad1c7376f50f2830/datasette/app.py#L297-L328 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/780/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
629535669 | MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjk1MzU2Njk= | 794 | Show hooks implemented by each plugin on /-/plugins | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2020-06-02T21:44:38Z | 2020-06-02T22:30:17Z | 2020-06-02T21:50:10Z | OWNER | e.g. ```json { "name": "qs_actor.py", "static": false, "templates": false, "version": null, "hooks": [ "actor_from_request" ] } ``` | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/794/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
629595228 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NDI2ODkxNDcx | 796 | New WIP writable canned queries | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 9 | 2020-06-03T00:08:00Z | 2020-06-03T15:16:52Z | 2020-06-03T15:16:50Z | OWNER | simonw/datasette/pulls/796 | Refs #698. Replaces #703 Still todo: - [x] Unit tests - ~~Figure out `.json` mode~~ - [x] Flash message solution - ~~CSRF protection~~ - [x] Better error message display on errors - [x] Documentation - ~~Maybe widgets?~~ I'll do these later | datasette 107914493 | pull | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/796/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 0 | ||||
631932926 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzE5MzI5MjY= | 801 | allow_by_query setting for configuring permissions with a SQL statement | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 6 | 2020-06-05T20:30:19Z | 2020-06-11T18:58:56Z | 2020-06-11T18:58:49Z | OWNER | > Idea: an `"allow_sql"` key with a SQL query that gets passed the actor JSON as `:actor` and can extract the relevant keys from it and return 1 or 0. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/698#issuecomment-639787304_ See also #800 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/801/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
636511683 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzY1MTE2ODM= | 830 | Redesign register_facet_classes plugin hook | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2020-06-10T20:03:27Z | 2021-12-16T19:58:22Z | OWNER | Nothing uses this plugin hook yet, so the design is not yet proven. I'm going to build a real plugin against it and use that process to inform any design changes that may need to be made. I'll add a warning about this to the documentation. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/830/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
639072811 | MDU6SXNzdWU2MzkwNzI4MTE= | 849 | Rename master branch to main | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 10 | 2020-06-15T19:05:54Z | 2022-10-27T13:57:08Z | 2020-09-15T20:37:14Z | OWNER | I was waiting for consensus to form around this (and kind-of hoping for `trunk` since I like the tree metaphor) and it looks like `main` is it. I've seen convincing arguments against `trunk` too - it indicates that the branch has some special significance like in Subversion (where all branches come from trunk) when it doesn't. So `main` is better anyway. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/849/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
642297505 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDIyOTc1MDU= | 857 | Comprehensive documentation for variables made available to templates | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2020-06-20T03:19:43Z | 2022-10-26T02:58:17Z | 2022-10-26T02:58:17Z | OWNER | Needed for the Datasette 1.0 release, so template authors can trust that Datasette is unlikely to break their templates. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/857/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
648435885 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NDg0MzU4ODU= | 878 | New pattern for views that return either JSON or HTML, available for plugins | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 26 | 2020-06-30T19:26:13Z | 2022-03-19T16:19:30Z | OWNER | Can be part of #870 - refactoring existing views to use `register_routes()`. > I'm going to put the new `check_permissions()` method on `BaseView` as well. If I want that method to be available to plugins I can do so by turning that `BaseView` class into a documented API that plugins are encouraged to use themselves. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-651995453_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/878/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
668064026 | MDU6SXNzdWU2NjgwNjQwMjY= | 911 | Rethink the --name option to "datasette publish" | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-07-29T18:49:49Z | 2020-07-29T18:49:49Z | OWNER | `--name` works inconsistently across the different publish providers - on Cloud Run you should use `--service` instead for example. Need to review it across all of them and either remove it or clarify what it does. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/911/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
678760988 | MDU6SXNzdWU2Nzg3NjA5ODg= | 932 | End-user documentation | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 6 | 2020-08-13T22:04:39Z | 2022-03-08T15:20:48Z | OWNER | Datasette's documentation is aimed at people who install and configure it. What about end users of preconfigured and deployed Datasette instances? Something that can be linked to from the Datasette UI would be really useful. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/932/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
687694947 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODc2OTQ5NDc= | 954 | Remove old register_output_renderer dict mechanism in Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2020-08-28T04:04:23Z | 2020-08-28T04:56:31Z | OWNER | > Documentation says that the old dictionary mechanism will be deprecated by 1.0: > > https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/799ecae94824640bdff21f86997f69844048d5c3/docs/plugin_hooks.rst#L460 _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/953#issuecomment-682312494_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/954/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
688622148 | MDU6SXNzdWU2ODg2MjIxNDg= | 957 | Simplify imports of common classes | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 7 | 2020-08-29T23:44:04Z | 2022-02-06T06:36:41Z | 2022-02-06T06:34:37Z | OWNER | There are only a few classes that plugins need to import. It would be nice if these imports were as short and memorable as possible. For example: ```python from datasette.app import Datasette from datasette.utils.asgi import Response ``` Could both become: ```python from datasette import Datasette from datasette import Response ``` | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/957/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
718259202 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTgyNTkyMDI= | 1005 | Remove xfail tests when new httpx is released | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2020-10-09T16:00:19Z | 2021-02-28T22:41:08Z | 2021-02-28T22:41:08Z | OWNER | > My `httpx` pull request adding `raw_path` support was just merged: https://github.com/encode/httpx/pull/1357 - but it's not in a release yet. > > I'm going to mark these tests as `xfail` so I can land this change - I'll remove that once an `httpx` release comes out that I can use to get the tests passing. > _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1000#issuecomment-706263157_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1005/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
718540751 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg1NDA3NTE= | 1012 | For 1.0 update trove classifier in setup.py | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 5 | 2020-10-10T05:52:08Z | 2021-11-16T13:18:36Z | OWNER | Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1012/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
730210880 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MzAyMTA4ODA= | 1055 | query.html and table.html should share the same table implementation | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-10-27T07:58:21Z | 2020-10-27T07:58:29Z | OWNER | In #998 I made a change that affected the table page but didn't affect the query page because I incorrectly assumed they shared rendering logic. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1055/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
732674148 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MzI2NzQxNDg= | 1062 | Refactor .csv to be an output renderer - and teach register_output_renderer to stream all rows | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 5 | 2020-10-29T21:25:02Z | 2022-09-28T14:09:54Z | OWNER | This can drive the upgrade of the `register_output_renderer` hook to be able to handle streaming all rows in a large query. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1062/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
734777631 | MDU6SXNzdWU3MzQ3Nzc2MzE= | 1080 | "View all" option for facets, to provide a (paginated) list of ALL of the facet counts plus a link to view them | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 7 | 2020-11-02T19:55:06Z | 2022-02-04T06:25:18Z | OWNER | Can use `/database/-/...` namespace from #296 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1080/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
749283032 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NDkyODMwMzI= | 1101 | register_output_renderer() should support streaming data | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 13 | 2020-11-24T02:17:09Z | 2023-01-21T22:07:19Z | OWNER | > I'd like to implement this by first extending the `register_output_renderer()` hook to support streaming huge responses, then switching CSV to use the plugin hook in addition to TSV using it. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1096#issuecomment-732542285_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1101/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
750089847 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NTAwODk4NDc= | 1109 | Deprecate --config in Datasette 1.0 (in favour of --setting) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2020-11-24T21:43:57Z | 2020-12-17T22:07:49Z | OWNER | I added a deprecation warning to this in #992. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1109/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
764059235 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NjQwNTkyMzU= | 1143 | More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices | yurivish 114388 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 6 | 2020-12-12T17:06:35Z | 2022-02-13T17:41:17Z | NONE | It would be nice if the `--cors` option accepted an origin regex to more securely allow secure local development. As an example, Observable notebooks namespace every user's notebooks by their username and user content is served from username.observableusercontent.com, so you would set `--cors-origin username.observableusercontent.com` to restrict access to a local development Datasette instance to only your own notebooks, rather than exposing the data to any website that makes a request. Thank you for all of your work on Datasette! | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1143/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
769520939 | MDU6SXNzdWU3Njk1MjA5Mzk= | 1149 | Make it easier to theme Datasette with CSS | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2020-12-17T05:01:26Z | 2021-03-22T21:43:16Z | OWNER | I want to theme https://datasette.io/ so that when you visit https://datasette.io/content (the Datasette UI part of it) the navigation from the parent site is used. I tried dropping in a `base.html` template like this: ```html {% extends "page_base.html" %} {% block base_extra_head %} <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, shrink-to-fit=no"> {% for url in extra_css_urls %} <link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ url.url }}"{% if url.sri %} integrity="{{ url.sri }}" crossorigin="anonymous"{% endif %}> {% endfor %} {% for url in extra_js_urls %} <script src="{{ url.url }}"{% if url.sri %} integrity="{{ url.sri }}" crossorigin="anonymous"{% endif %}></script> {% endfor %} {% block extra_head %}{% endblock %} {% endblock %} {% block extra_body_end %} {% include "_close_open_menus.html" %} {% for body_script in body_scripts %} <script>{{ body_script }}</script> {% endfor %} {% endblock %} ``` But this resulted in pages looking like this: <img width="1067" alt="content__categories__3_rows" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/102446045-c168e280-3fe1-11eb-94d6-e7350798eb96.png"> Note that the cog menu is broken and the filter UI is unstyled. To get these working correctly I would need to copy over a whole lot of Datasette's default CSS - and that means that when Datasette changes in the future those pages could break in subtle ways. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1149/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
770436876 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NzA0MzY4NzY= | 1150 | Maintain an in-memory SQLite table of connected databases and their tables | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 32 | 2020-12-17T23:02:13Z | 2020-12-27T14:51:39Z | 2020-12-18T22:34:12Z | OWNER | I want Datasette to have its own internal metadata about connected tables, to power features like a paginated searchable homepage in #461. I want this to be a SQLite table. This could also be part of the directory scanning mechanism prototyped in #672 - where Datasette can be set to continually scan a directory for new database files that it can serve. Also relevant to the Datasette Library concept in #417. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1150/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
779691739 | MDU6SXNzdWU3Nzk2OTE3Mzk= | 1176 | Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 13 | 2021-01-05T22:55:25Z | 2022-02-07T06:43:32Z | 2022-02-07T06:42:58Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/datasette-css-properties starts [like this](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-css-properties/blob/0.1/datasette_css_properties/__init__.py#L1-L3): ```python from datasette import hookimpl from datasette.utils.asgi import Response from datasette.utils import escape_css_string, to_css_class ``` `escape_css_string` and `to_css_class` are not documented, which means relying on them is risky since there's no promise that they won't change. Would be good to figure out a policy on this, and maybe promote some of them to "documented" status. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
780153562 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODAxNTM1NjI= | 1177 | Ability to stream all rows as newline-delimited JSON | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2021-01-06T07:10:48Z | 2022-03-21T15:08:52Z | OWNER | > Yet another use-case for this: I want to be able to stream newline-delimited JSON in order to better import into Pandas: > > pandas.read_json("https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys.json?_shape=array&_nl=on", lines=True) _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1101#issuecomment-755128038_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1177/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
787098345 | MDU6SXNzdWU3ODcwOTgzNDU= | 1191 | Ability for plugins to collaborate when adding extra HTML to blocks in default templates | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 11 | 2021-01-15T18:18:51Z | 2022-08-01T05:39:27Z | OWNER | Sometimes a plugin may want to add content to an existing default template - for example `datasette-search-all` adds a new search box at the top of `index.html`. I also want `datasette-upload-csvs` to add a CTA on the `database.html` page: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-upload-csvs/issues/18 Currently plugins can do this by providing a new version of the `index.html` template - but if multiple plugins try to do that only one of them will succeed. It would be better if there were known areas of those templates which plugins could add additional content to, such that multiple plugins can use the same spot. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1191/reactions", "total_count": 4, "+1": 4, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
793027837 | MDU6SXNzdWU3OTMwMjc4Mzc= | 1205 | Rename /:memory: to /_memory | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2021-01-25T05:04:56Z | 2021-01-28T22:55:02Z | 2021-01-28T22:51:42Z | OWNER | For consistency with `/_internal` - and because then we don't need to escape the `:` characters. This change would need to be in before Datasette 1.0. I could land it earlier and set up redirects from the old URLs though. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1205/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
812704869 | MDU6SXNzdWU4MTI3MDQ4Njk= | 1237 | ?_pretty=1 option for pretty-printing JSON output | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2021-02-20T20:54:40Z | 2021-11-16T18:28:33Z | OWNER | Suggested by @frankieroberto in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-782746755 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1237/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
957310278 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTczMTAyNzg= | 1409 | `default_allow_sql` setting (a re-imagining of the old `allow_sql` setting) | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 10 | 2021-07-31T19:48:56Z | 2023-01-07T18:06:01Z | 2023-01-05T00:51:31Z | OWNER | In 49d6d2f7b0f6cb02e25022e1c9403811f1fa0a7c as part of #813 I removed the `allow_sql` setting - on the basis that users could disable the ability to execute custom SQL queries using the new permission system instead. I don't think this was the right decision. Disabling custom SQL is an important security capability, and explaining how to do it using permissions is significantly more complex than letting people know they can add `--setting allow_sql off`. So I want to bring that setting back - maybe with a different, better name - and have it modify the default for that option if the permissions system doesn't have an opinion. That way people can still use the setting but then use permissions to allow specific signed-in users access to execute SQL. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1409/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
957315684 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NTczMTU2ODQ= | 1410 | Rename settings to `default_allow_facet` and `default_allow_download` and `default_allow_csv_stream` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2021-07-31T20:27:12Z | 2021-07-31T20:27:49Z | OWNER | > If I was prone to over-thinking (which I am) I'd note that `allow_facet` and `allow_download` and `allow_csv_stream` are all settings that do NOT have an equivalent in the newer permissions system, which is itself a little weird and inconsistent. > > So maybe there's a future task where I introduce those as both permissions and metadata `"allow_x"` blocks, then rename the settings themselves to be called `default_allow_facet` and `default_allow_download` and `default_allow_csv_stream`. > > If I was going to do that I should get it in before Datasette 1.0. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1409#issuecomment-890400425_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1410/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
973139047 | MDU6SXNzdWU5NzMxMzkwNDc= | 1439 | Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 48 | 2021-08-17T23:32:51Z | 2022-03-15T20:51:26Z | 2022-03-15T20:51:26Z | OWNER | Datasette currently has surprising special behaviour for if a table name ends in `.csv` - which can happen when a tool like `csvs-to-sqlite` creates tables that match the filename that they were imported from. https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv illustrates this behaviour: it links to `.csv` and `.json` that look like this: - https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv?_format=json - https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv?_format=csv&_size=max Where normally Datasette would add the `.csv` or `.json` extension to the path component of the URL (as seen on other pages such as https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facet_cities) here the [path_with_format() function](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/adb5b70de5cec3c3dd37184defe606a082c232cf/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L710) notices that there is already a `.` in the path and instead adds `?_format=csv` to the query string instead. The problem with this mechanism is that it's pretty surprising. Anyone writing external code to Datasette who wants to get back the `.csv` or `.json` version giving the URL to a table page will need to know about and implement this behaviour themselves. That's likely to cause all kinds of bugs in the future. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1054243511 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1nq3 | 1509 | Datasette 1.0 JSON API (and documentation) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2021-11-15T23:22:45Z | 2022-03-15T20:38:56Z | OWNER | The new JSON API in a stable, documented form. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1509/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1054244712 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1n9o | 1510 | Datasette 1.0 documented template context (maybe via API docs) | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2021-11-15T23:23:58Z | 2023-06-28T02:05:21Z | OWNER | Documented context plus protective unit tests. Goal is that custom templates built for 1.x will not break without a 2.x release. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1510/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1054246919 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1ogH | 1511 | Review plugin hooks for Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2021-11-15T23:26:05Z | 2021-11-16T01:20:14Z | OWNER | I need to perform a detailed review of the plugin interface - especially the plugin hooks like [register_facet_classes()](https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/plugin_hooks.html#register-facet-classes) which I don't yet have complete confidence in. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1511/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1057996111 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_D71P | 1517 | Let `register_routes()` over-ride default routes within Datasette | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2021-11-19T00:22:15Z | 2021-11-19T03:20:00Z | 2021-11-19T03:07:27Z | OWNER | See https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/878#issuecomment-973554024_ - right now `register_routes()` can't replace default Datasette routes. It would be neat if plugins could do this - especially if there was a neat documented way for them to then re-dispatch to the original route code after making some kind of modification. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1517/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1058072543 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_EOff | 1518 | Complete refactor of TableView and table.html template | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 45 | 2021-11-19T02:55:16Z | 2022-03-15T18:35:49Z | OWNER | Split from #878. The current `TableView` class is by far the most complex part of Datasette, and the most difficult to work on: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.59.2/datasette/views/table.py In #878 I started exploring a new pattern for building views. In doing so it became clear that `TableView` is the first beast that I need to slay - if I can refactor that into something neat the pattern for building other views will emerge as a natural consequence. I've been trying to build this as a `register_routes()` plugin, as originally suggested in #870 - though unfortunately it looks like those plugins can't replace existing Datasette default views at the moment, see #1517. [UPDATE: I was wrong about this, plugins can over-ride default views just fine] I also know that I want to have a fully documented template context for `table.html` as a major step on the way to Datasette 1.0, see #1510. All of this adds up to the `TableView` factor being a major project that will unblock a whole flurry of other things - so I'm going to work on that in this separate issue. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1518/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1065429936 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gSuw | 1532 | Use datasette-table Web Component to guide the design of the JSON API for 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2021-11-28T20:37:18Z | 2022-03-16T20:13:34Z | OWNER | I realized that one of the reasons I'm having trouble committing to nailing down the JSON API for 1.0 is that I don't use it much myself - I use the `?_shape=array` one quite often, but I don't have any projects that are using the default, more fully-featured API. As an experiment I built a Web Component for embedding Datasette tables on pages - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-table - and I think it's actually going to be a really useful tool for helping me dog food the v1.0 API design. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1532/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1065431383 | I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gTFX | 1533 | Add `Link: rel="alternate"` header pointing to JSON for a table/query | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2021-11-28T20:43:25Z | 2022-02-02T07:56:51Z | 2022-02-02T07:49:33Z | OWNER | Originally explored in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-notebook/issues/2#issuecomment-980789406 - I wanted an efficient way to scan a list of URLs and figure out which if any of those corresponded to Datasette tables, canned queries or SQL output that could be represented as a table on a page. It looks like a neat way to do that is with ` Link:` header like this: `Link: http://127.0.0.1:8058/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys.json; rel="alternate"; type="application/datasette+json"` I can put a `<link href=...` in the page header too. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1533/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1077620955 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5AOzDb | 1549 | Redesign CSV export to improve usability | fgregg 536941 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 5 | 2021-12-11T19:02:12Z | 2022-04-04T11:17:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | *Original title: Set content type for CSV so that browsers will attempt to download instead opening in the browser* Right now, if the user clicks on the CSV related to a <s>table or a</s> query, the response header for the content type is "content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8" Most browsers will try to open a file with this content-type in the browser. This is not what most people want to do, and lots of folks don't know that if they want to download the CSV and open it in the a spreadsheet program they next need to save the page through their browser. It would be great if the response header could be something like ``` 'Content-type: text/csv'); 'Content-disposition: attachment;filename=MyVerySpecial.csv'); ``` which would lead browsers to open a download dialog. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1549/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1082584499 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ahu2z | 1558 | Redesign `facet_results` JSON structure prior to Datasette 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2021-12-16T19:45:10Z | 2023-01-09T15:31:17Z | OWNER | > Decision: as an initial fix I'm going to de-duplicate those keys by using `tags__array` etc - with a `_2` on the end if that key is already used. > > I'll open a separate issue to redesign this better for Datasette 1.0. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/625#issuecomment-996130862_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1558/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1087181951 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5AzRR_ | 1576 | Traces should include SQL executed by subtasks created with `asyncio.gather` | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2021-12-22T20:52:02Z | 2022-02-05T05:21:35Z | 2022-02-05T05:19:53Z | OWNER | I tried running some parallel SQL queries using `asyncio.gather()` but the SQL that was executed didn't show up in the trace rendered by https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-pretty-traces I realized that was because traces are keyed against the current task ID, which changes when a sub-task is run using `asyncio.gather` or similar. The faceting and suggest faceting queries are missing from this trace: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/147153855-2d611f07-922a-4d18-9e6e-4be89e010dc4.png) > The reason they aren't showing up in the traces is that traces are stored just for the currently executing `asyncio` task ID: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/ace86566b28280091b3844cf5fbecd20158e9004/datasette/tracer.py#L13-L25 > > This is so traces for other incoming requests don't end up mixed together. But there's no current mechanism to track async tasks that are effectively "child tasks" of the current request, and hence should be tracked the same. > > https://stackoverflow.com/a/69349501/6083 suggests that you pass the task ID as an argument to the child tasks that are executed using `asyncio.gather()` to work around this kind of problem. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1518#issuecomment-999870993_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1576/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1087913724 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5A2D78 | 1577 | Drop support for Python 3.6 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 6 | 2021-12-23T18:17:03Z | 2022-01-25T23:30:03Z | 2022-01-20T04:31:41Z | OWNER | *Original title: Decide when to drop support for Python 3.6* > `context_vars` can solve this but they were introduced in Python 3.7: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0567/ > > Python 3.6 support ends in a few days time, and it looks like Glitch has updated to 3.7 now - so maybe I can get away with Datasette needing 3.7 these days? > > Tweeted about that here: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1473761478155010048 _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1576#issuecomment-999878907_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1577/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1108235694 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5CDlWu | 1603 | A proper favicon | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 19 | 2022-01-19T15:24:55Z | 2022-03-19T04:04:49Z | 2022-01-20T06:07:31Z | OWNER | Tips here: https://adamj.eu/tech/2022/01/18/how-to-add-a-favicon-to-your-django-site/ - I think a PNG served at `/favicon.ico` is the best option, since safari doesn't support SVG yet. Relevant code: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cb29119db9115b1f40de2fb45263ed77e3bfbb3e/datasette/app.py#L182-L183 I can reuse the icon for https://datasette.io/desktop | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1109783030 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5CJfH2 | 1607 | More detailed information about installed SpatiaLite version | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2022-01-20T21:28:03Z | 2022-02-09T06:42:02Z | 2022-02-09T06:32:28Z | OWNER | https://www.gaia-gis.it/gaia-sins/spatialite-sql-5.0.0.html#version has a whole bunch of interesting functions for things like `freexl_version()` and `geos_version()` and `HasMathSQL()` and suchlike. These could be shown on the `/-/versions` page. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1607/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1114147905 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5CaIxB | 1612 | Move canned queries closer to the SQL input area | jsfenfen 639012 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 5 | 2022-01-25T17:06:39Z | 2022-03-19T04:04:49Z | 2022-01-25T18:34:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | *Original title: Consider placing example queries above the sql input?* Hi! Have been enjoying deploying ad hoc datasettes for collaborators to pick over! I keep finding myself manually "fixing" the database.html template so that the "example queries" (canned queries) appear directly *over* the sql box? So they are sorta more a suggestion for collaborators who aren't inclined to write their own queries? My sense is any time I go to the trouble of writing canned queries my users should see 'em? (( I have also considered a client-side reactive-ish option where selecting a query just places the raw SQL in the box and doesn't execute it, but this seems to end up being an inconvenience, rather than a teaching tool. )) | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1612/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1121618041 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5C2oh5 | 1620 | Link: rel="alternate" to JSON for queries too | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2022-02-02T08:02:42Z | 2022-02-02T21:53:02Z | 2022-02-02T21:33:00Z | OWNER | Following: - #1533 I implemented it for tables and rows but I should have done queries as well. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1620/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1122413719 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5qyX | 1621 | Test against Python 3.11 dev version | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-02-02T21:38:57Z | 2022-03-19T04:04:49Z | 2022-02-02T21:58:54Z | OWNER | To avoid another surprise like we got with 3.10: https://simonwillison.net/2021/Oct/9/finding-and-reporting-a-bug/ From a quick GitHub code search it looks like `3.11-dev` should work: https://cs.github.com/urllib3/urllib3/blob/7bec77e81aa0a194c98381053225813f5347c9d2/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L60 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1621/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1122416919 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5rkX | 1623 | /-/patterns returns link: alternate JSON header to 404 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2022-02-02T21:42:49Z | 2022-03-19T04:04:49Z | 2022-02-02T21:48:56Z | OWNER | Bug from: - #1620 ``` % curl -s -I 'https://latest.datasette.io/-/patterns' | grep link link: https://latest.datasette.io/-/patterns.json; rel="alternate"; type="application/json+datasette" ``` | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1623/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1125576543 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5DFu9f | 1630 | Review datasette.utils and decide which functions should be documented for 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-02-07T06:39:52Z | 2022-02-07T06:39:52Z | OWNER | Follows: - #1176 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1630/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1126604194 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5DJp2i | 1632 | datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 6 | 2022-02-07T23:14:47Z | 2022-03-19T04:04:49Z | 2022-02-07T23:50:01Z | OWNER | > ``` > % mkdir /tmp/data > % cp ~/Dropbox/Development/datasette/fixtures.db /tmp/data > % datasette /tmp/data/*.db /tmp/data/created.db --create -p 8852 > ... > INFO: Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8852 (Press CTRL+C to quit) > ^CINFO: Shutting down > % datasette /tmp/data/*.db /tmp/data/created.db --create -p 8852 > ... > INFO: 127.0.0.1:49533 - "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 OK > ``` > The first time I ran Datasette I got two databases - `fixtures` and `created` > > BUT... when I ran Datasette the second time it looked like this: > > <img width="697" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/152887735-5e2b4f21-001d-4e7a-a23a-16a32fdcf554.png"> > > This is the same result you get if you run: > > datasette /tmp/data/fixtures.db /tmp/data/created.db /tmp/data/created.db > > This is caused by this Datasette issue: > - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/509 > > So... either I teach Datasette to de-duplicate multiple identical file paths passed to the command, or I can't use `/data/*.db` in the `Dockerfile` here and I need to go back to other solutions for the challenge described in this comment: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-fly/pull/12#issuecomment-1031971831 _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-fly/pull/12#issuecomment-1032029874_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1131295060 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5DbjFU | 1634 | Update Dockerfile generated by `datasette publish` | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2022-02-11T00:07:26Z | 2022-03-11T17:38:08Z | OWNER | The generated `Dockerfile` currently looks something like this: ```Dockerfile FROM python:3.8 COPY . /app WORKDIR /app ENV DATASETTE_SECRET 'edab49cbc5d5f6f33238f54852037e3fee710821960b73edd2ce743454182ae2' RUN pip install -U datasette datasette-auth-passwords datasette-tiddlywiki datasette-graphql RUN datasette inspect fixtures.db other.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json ENV PORT 8080 EXPOSE 8080 CMD datasette serve --host 0.0.0.0 -i fixtures.db -i other.db --cors --inspect-file inspect-data.json --metadata metadata.json --create --port $PORT /data/*.db ``` This is still on Python 3.8, and it generates a pretty large image compared to the `Dockerfile` used for https://hub.docker.com/datasetteproject/datasette - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.60.2/Dockerfile Here's the code that generates it: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7d24fd405f3c60e4c852c5d746c91aa2ba23cf5b/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L389-L400 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1634/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 2, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1154399841 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ezr5h | 1645 | Sensible `cache-control` headers for static assets, including those served by plugins | curiousleo 697092 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 4 | 2022-02-28T18:12:03Z | 2022-03-08T02:59:29Z | NONE | ## What I'm seeing With `default_cache_ttl = 86400`, I see the following: A table view returns `Cache-control: max-age=86400`: ![Screenshot_20220228_190000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/697092/156034352-4d64683e-39c8-49af-81df-0217a5957bbd.png) A static asset returns no `Cache-control` header: ![Screenshot_20220228_185933](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/697092/156034363-d0b03cc2-5889-4ed2-b601-8c1846b8469a.png) ## What I expected to see I expected the static asset to return a `Cache-control` header indicating that this response can be cached. ## Why this matters I'm productionising a Datasette deployment right now and was looking into putting it behind a Varnish instance. I was surprised to see requests for static assets being served from Datasette rather than Varnish, this is what led me to look more closely at the response headers. While Datasette serves those static assets pretty quickly, I don't see why Datasette should serve them. By their nature, static assets like images and JS files are very cacheable, so it should be easy to serve them from a cache like Varnish. (Note that Varnish can easily be configured to override this header, enabling caching for static assets. But it would be better if this override was not necessary.) ## Discussion It seems clear to me that serving static assets without a `Cache-control` header is not ideal. I see two options here: A. Static assets use the same logic as table / SQL views to set the `Cache-control` header based on `default_cache_ttl`. B. An additional setting for static assets is introduced (`default_static_cache_ttl`, say). | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1645/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1160750713 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5FL6Z5 | 1650 | Implement redirects from old % encoding to new dash encoding | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 5 | 2022-03-06T23:40:02Z | 2022-03-07T19:26:15Z | 2022-03-07T19:26:14Z | OWNER | > One big advantage to this scheme is that redirecting old links to `%2F` pages (e.g. https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/fivethirtyeight/twitter-ratio%2Fsenators) is easy - if you see a `%` in the `raw_path`, redirect to that page with the `%` replaced by `-`. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1060044007_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1650/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1161584460 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5FPF9M | 1651 | Get rid of the no-longer necessary ?_format=json hack for tables called x.json | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 8 | 2022-03-07T15:40:42Z | 2022-03-19T04:04:50Z | 2022-03-15T18:25:42Z | OWNER | Tidy up from: - #1439 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1651/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1168995756 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5FrXWs | 1657 | Tilde encoding: use ~ instead of - for dash-encoding | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 12 | 2022-03-14T22:55:17Z | 2022-03-15T18:25:11Z | 2022-03-15T18:01:58Z | OWNER | Refs #1439 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1657/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1169840669 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Fulod | 1658 | Revert main to version that passes tests | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-15T15:37:02Z | 2022-03-19T04:04:50Z | 2022-03-15T15:42:58Z | OWNER | > I've made a real mess of this. I'm going to revert Datasette`main` back to the last commit that passed the tests and try this again in a branch. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1657#issuecomment-1068125636_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1658/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1170144879 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Fvv5v | 1660 | Refactor and simplify Datasette routing and views | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 8 | 2022-03-15T19:56:56Z | 2022-03-21T19:19:12Z | 2022-03-21T19:19:01Z | OWNER | While working on: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1657 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 It became very clear that the least maintainable part of Datasette at the moment is the way routing to the database, table and row views work - in particular the subclassing mechanism with BaseView and DataView, but also the complex variety of ways in which the URL routes capture different named regular expression groups. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1660/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1170355774 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5FwjY- | 1661 | Remove Hashed URL mode | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 10 | 2022-03-15T23:13:56Z | 2022-03-19T00:37:37Z | 2022-03-19T00:37:36Z | OWNER | It's now handled by a plugin instead: - #647 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls/issues/3 https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls Sub-tasks: - [x] Remove hashed URL mode implementation - [x] Update documentation - [x] Ensure `--setting hash_urls 1` shows a useful message | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1661/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1170554975 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5FxUBf | 1663 | Document the internals that were used in datasette-hashed-urls | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2022-03-16T05:17:08Z | 2022-03-19T04:04:50Z | 2022-03-17T21:32:38Z | OWNER | The https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls used a couple of currently undocumented features: - `db.hash` - `Datasette(..., immutables=[...])` | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1663/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1174162781 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5F_E1d | 1666 | Refactor URL routing to enable testing | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2022-03-19T03:52:29Z | 2022-03-19T16:32:03Z | 2022-03-19T16:32:03Z | OWNER | I ran into some bugs earlier with URL routing - having more robust testing around this (especially since they are defined using regular expressions) would be really useful. - A utility function that resolves a path against a list of reflexes and returns the match - Make the routes and regular expressions available from a private Datasette method - Add tests that exercise them Related: - #1660 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1666/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1174302994 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5F_nES | 1667 | Make route matched pattern groups more consistent | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2022-03-19T16:32:35Z | 2022-03-19T20:37:42Z | 2022-03-19T20:37:41Z | OWNER | > ... highlights how inconsistent the way the capturing works is. Especially `as_format` which can be `None` or `""` or `.json` or `json` or not used at all in the case of `TableView`. https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/764738dfcb16cd98b0987d443f59d5baa9d3c332/tests/test_routes.py#L12-L36 _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1666#issuecomment-1073039670_ Part of: - #1660 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1667/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1174306154 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5F_n1q | 1668 | Introduce concept of a database `route`, separate from its name | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 20 | 2022-03-19T16:48:28Z | 2022-03-20T16:43:16Z | 2022-03-20T16:43:16Z | OWNER | Some issues came up in the new `datasette-hashed-urls` plugin relating to the way it renames databases on startup to achieve unique URLs that depend on the database SHA-256 content: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls/issues/10 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls/issues/9 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-hashed-urls/issues/8 All three of these could be addressed by making the "path" concept for a database (the `/foo` bit where it is served) work independently of the database's name, which would be used for default display and also as the alias when configuring cross-database aliases. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1668/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1174697144 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GBHS4 | 1672 | Refactor CSV handling code out of DataView | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-20T21:47:00Z | 2022-03-20T21:52:39Z | OWNER | > I think the way to get rid of most of the remaining complexity in `DataView` is to refactor how CSV stuff works - pulling it in line with other export factors and extracting the streaming mechanism. Opening a fresh issue for that. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1660#issuecomment-1073355032_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1672/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1174717287 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GBMNn | 1674 | Tweak design of /.json | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-20T22:58:01Z | 2022-03-20T22:58:40Z | OWNER | https://latest.datasette.io/.json Currently: ```json { "_memory": { "name": "_memory", "hash": null, "color": "a6c7b9", "path": "/_memory", "tables_and_views_truncated": [], "tables_and_views_more": false, "tables_count": 0, "table_rows_sum": 0, "show_table_row_counts": false, "hidden_table_rows_sum": 0, "hidden_tables_count": 0, "views_count": 0, "private": false }, "fixtures": { "name": "fixtures", "hash": "645005884646eb941c89997fbd1c0dd6be517cb1b493df9816ae497c0c5afbaa", "color": "645005", "path": "/fixtures", "tables_and_views_truncated": [ { "name": "compound_three_primary_keys", "columns": [ "pk1", "pk2", "pk3", "content" ], "primary_keys": [ "pk1", "pk2", "pk3" ], "count": 1001, "hidden": false, "fts_table": null, "num_relationships_for_sorting": 0, "private": false }, ``` As-of this issue the `"path"` key is confusing, it doesn't match what https://latest.datasette.io/-/databases returns: - #1668 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1674/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1175690070 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE5tW | 1676 | Reconsider ensure_permissions() logic, can it be less confusing? | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2022-03-21T17:14:57Z | 2022-12-02T01:23:40Z | OWNER | > Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/docs/internals.rst#await-ensure_permissionsactor-permissions > >> This method allows multiple permissions to be checked at onced. It raises a `datasette.Forbidden` exception if any of the checks are denied before one of them is explicitly granted. >> >> This is useful when you need to check multiple permissions at once. For example, an actor should be able to view a table if either one of the following checks returns `True` or not a single one of them returns `False`: > > That's pretty hard to understand! I'm going to open a separate issue to reconsider if this is a useful enough abstraction given how confusing it is. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1675#issuecomment-1074177827_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1676/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1175694248 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE6uo | 1677 | Remove `check_permission()` from `BaseView` | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-21T17:18:18Z | 2022-03-21T18:45:04Z | 2022-03-21T18:45:03Z | OWNER | Follow-on from: - #1675 Refs: - #1660 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1677/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1175715988 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFACU | 1678 | Make `check_visibility()` a documented API | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-03-21T17:30:34Z | 2022-03-21T19:04:03Z | 2022-03-21T19:01:46Z | OWNER | Spotted this while working on: - #1677 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L1005-L1021 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1678/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1175854982 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFh-G | 1679 | Research: how much overhead does the n=1 time limit have? | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 11 | 2022-03-21T19:27:46Z | 2022-03-21T21:55:57Z | 2022-03-21T21:55:56Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1a7750eb29fd15dd2eea3b9f6e33028ce441b143/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L181-L200 ```python @contextmanager def sqlite_timelimit(conn, ms): deadline = time.perf_counter() + (ms / 1000) # n is the number of SQLite virtual machine instructions that will be # executed between each check. It's hard to know what to pick here. # After some experimentation, I've decided to go with 1000 by default and # 1 for time limits that are less than 50ms n = 1000 if ms < 50: n = 1 def handler(): if time.perf_counter() >= deadline: return 1 conn.set_progress_handler(handler, n) try: yield finally: conn.set_progress_handler(None, n) ``` How often do I set a time limit of 50 or less? How much slower does it go thanks to this code? | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1679/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1175894898 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFrty | 1680 | Consider simplifying permissions for 1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-03-21T20:17:29Z | 2022-03-21T20:17:29Z | OWNER | Permission checks right now can express one of three opinions: - `False` means "so not grant this permisson" - `True` means "grant this permission" - `None` means "I have no opinion" But... there's also a concept of a "default" for a given permission check, which might be `False` or `True`. I worry this is too complicated. Could this be simplified before 1.0? In particular the default concept. See also: - #1676 | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1680/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1189113609 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5G4G8J | 1697 | `Request.fake(..., url_vars={})` | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 1 | 2022-04-01T01:48:40Z | 2022-04-01T02:02:18Z | 2022-04-01T02:02:10Z | OWNER | I just created an alternative `.fake()` method because I wanted to fake the `url_vars` captured in the route as well: ```python from datasette.utils.asgi import Request class Request(Request): @classmethod def fake(cls, path_with_query_string, method="GET", scheme="http", url_vars=None): """Useful for constructing Request objects for tests""" path, _, query_string = path_with_query_string.partition("?") scope = { "http_version": "1.1", "method": method, "path": path, "raw_path": path_with_query_string.encode("latin-1"), "query_string": query_string.encode("latin-1"), "scheme": scheme, "type": "http", } if url_vars: scope["url_route"] = { "kwargs": url_vars } return cls(scope, None) ``` | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1697/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1194790504 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HNw5o | 1701 | Use + for spaces instead of ~20 | simonw 9599 | closed | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-04-06T15:40:48Z | 2022-04-06T15:55:10Z | 2022-04-06T15:55:05Z | OWNER | Tilde encoding introduced in #1657 means that database files with spaces in the name - e.g. the Apple Mail `Envelope Index` database - end up with URLs like this: http://127.0.0.1:8001/Envelope~20Index I think this would be prettier: http://127.0.0.1:9933/Envelope+Index | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1701/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | completed | |||||
1197925865 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZuXp | 1704 | File PRs against incompatible plugins pinning to datasette<1.0 | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-04-08T23:15:30Z | 2022-04-08T23:15:30Z | OWNER | As part of the preparation for the 1.0 release, test all existing known plugins against the alpha. For any that break, submit a PR suggesting they pin to a version <1.0 - and include a link to the documentation on how to upgrade the plugin for 1.0. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1704/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1386854246 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sqbdm | 1822 | Switch to keyword-only arguments for a bunch of internal methods | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 3 | 2022-09-26T23:20:38Z | 2022-09-27T00:44:04Z | OWNER | This is a good idea, and one that needs to happen before Datasette 1.0: > While you are adding features, would you be future-proofing your APIs if you switched over some arguments over to keyword-only arguments or would that be too disruptive? > > Thinking out loud: > > ``` > async def render_template( > self, templates, *, context=None, plugin_context=None, request=None, view_name=None > ): > ``` _Originally posted by @jefftriplett in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256781274_ | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1822/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1454532488 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5WsmeI | 1902 | Document {% block crumbs %} for plugin authors | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 0 | 2022-11-18T06:16:30Z | 2022-11-18T06:16:39Z | OWNER | > For `datasette-copyable` I want to show breadcrumbs that take database/instance permissions into account, so I'm removing `{% block nav %}` entirely and replacing it with this: > > ```html+jinja > {% block crumbs %} > {{ crumbs.nav(request=request, database=database, table=table) }} > {% endblock %} > ``` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1901#issuecomment-1319588163_ I should document this. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1902/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | |||||||
1455928469 | I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wx7SV | 1903 | Refactor all error classes into a datasette.exceptions module | simonw 9599 | open | 0 | Datasette 1.0 3268330 | 2 | 2022-11-18T22:44:45Z | 2022-11-20T22:35:01Z | OWNER | While working on this issue: - #1896 I realized that Datasette has error classes scattered around a fair bit, including some in the `datasette.utils.asgi` module for some reason. I should clean these up. | datasette 107914493 | issue | {"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1903/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT , [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [state_reason] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);